|
nice interview ISF. the clip that you provide above is something i want to talk about. in your easy guide to aggression, you say
Try to play in such a way that easily defines your value bets and your bluffs
which seems in direct opposition to Aaron's thoughts. on one hand, it seems way better to actually know if we are ahead or behind, but if we are value betting so thin that we don't know for sure if we want to be called or not, doesn't that make us harder to read? i need to think more about which is better, but what did you think about his comments?
|