|
|
 Originally Posted by a500lbgorilla
I find it funny that people want the moon landings to be fake.
I saw a few documentaries about the landings being fake and I believed them. Then I saw a documentary where a NASA scientist was confronted with such evidence and he debunked them with science fact (apparently). So for the most part, he gave equally credible reasons against fakery as did the conspiracists. However, it was noticeable that he didn't answer 2 claims.
One was how a chest mounted camera could take face level shots of other astronauts and also frame the picture perfectly without any form of viewfinder. The second was the series of photographs that showed the cameras cross hairs behind objects in the frame. With all the other claims he took great pride in offering detailed explanations but here he just said "some people just like to not believe" and simply avoided answering.
Other claims not debunked:
How certain objects are perfectly lighted, even in isolation and that even though the photos were numbered, some shots were non sequential. Eg: Aldrin on the moon was shot 3 but Aldrin climbing out of the Eagle was shot 8.
So I am in the middle of the whole moon landing debacle until I get sound explanations/evidence for all the claims. NASA missed a big chance IMO by ducking those questions.
|
Reply With Quote