Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumFTR Community

**** Elections thread *****

Results 1 to 75 of 8309

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Quote Originally Posted by OngBonga View Post
    I think Trump is playing an excellent business hand. He send a tweet, and within two hours Amazon loses $5.5b. You think he and his cronies didn't make a wedge off that little exercise? He knows what he's doing.

    Politically, he's fucked. He's up against those who control the media, control how people think, because people are fucking morons and can't see how they are silencing and shaming anyone who speaks truth, while giving a platform to those who push their agenda. They control the senate, thet control the majority of the people, Trump can be armed to the teeth but unless he can put Soros in fucking jail, he's a puppet, whether he wants to be or not.

    But he can still use his position to make billions, so good luck to him gaming the system while being fucked up the arse by the deep state.
    Hasn't Trump's track record been showing that it is he doing the fucking?
  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by wufwugy View Post
    Hasn't Trump's track record been showing that it is he doing the fucking?
    Can he pass a bill? I dunno, last I heard he failed to get rid of Obamacare because McCain is a little weasle. And he had to sign off sanctions he didn't want to sign off.

    I mean he's the presiedent. Why isn't he in charge of foreign policy?
    Quote Originally Posted by wufwugy View Post
    ongies gonna ong
  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by OngBonga View Post
    Can he pass a bill? I dunno, last I heard he failed to get rid of Obamacare because McCain is a little weasle. And he had to sign off sanctions he didn't want to sign off.

    I mean he's the presiedent. Why isn't he in charge of foreign policy?
    He's signed a whole bunch of bills into law. Tons of executive action. Most focus on foreign policy and very big gains have resulted. Obamacare repeal would be one of the most impossibly epic feats in US political history. Trust me, it's gonna take time and he is working a plan.

    Keep in mind that EVERY part of what people hear about current events is filtered and formed by Democrats. Unless you get news from a handful of unaffiliated organizations, every media personality is a Democrat and the output is pro-Democrat and anti-Trump. Even when it appears unbiased and reasoned, rest assured that you are being told what to believe to be true by Democrats.

    They flat out do not cover any of the actual happenings of the Trump administration, and they make up everything else or focus on trivialities and paint them in a negative light.
  4. #4
    Jack Sawyer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    7,668
    Location
    Jack-high straight flush motherfucker
    Quote Originally Posted by wufwugy View Post
    Keep in mind that EVERY part of what people hear about current events is filtered and formed by Democrats. Unless you get news from a handful of unaffiliated organizations, every media personality is a Democrat and the output is pro-Democrat and anti-Trump. Even when it appears unbiased and reasoned, rest assured that you are being told what to believe to be true by Democrats
    *cough Fox News cough*

    Take off your tinfoil hat wuf. It seems to me that to you anything that comes through the grapevine that isn't pro Trump has to be democratic in nature. So you run into a corner of the internet that would suck Trump's *allegedly* tiny dick ad nauseam. That is the actual eco chamber bruh. So this constant "Fake News" indoctrination actually worked: anything that isn't pro Trump has to be Democratic in origin, and is ergo Fake News.

    In Mass Effect, this would be where Saren actually discovered the effects of Sovereign but still claimed to be in control, which SPOILER ALERT

    Spoiler:
    is a whole lot of bullshit. He was as in control as an alcoholic at a Whisky Factory



    I do remember how much flack Obama got for Jeremiah Wright. And then, nothing happened about that; that actually was a nothingburger. However, this isn't the same. The actual neo-nazis are pro Trump, want to be catered to by trump, vote for Trump, like Trump, sympathize with Trump AND HIS FUCKING VIEWS. The neo Nazis. The Nazis. Nazis, bruh.

    All he has to do is denounce and reject them. Simply tell them to fuck off. And yet for some reason he can't. And that is the point where the news people try to guess as to why. Why the fuck would he not tell the nazis to fuck off? Why can't he condemn them? Why would he specifically cut an anti nazi program?

    https://twitter.com/lifeafterhate/status/879837914036932608

    http://foreignpolicy.com/2017/06/26/dhs-strips-funding-from-group-that-counters-neo-nazi-violence/

    Maybe some of his best friends are black, though.



    Sidenote: Polls indicate his popularity is down the tubes. Actual declared wars and banging the war drums raise popularity. Wars simply serve to raise revenues for private contractors providing the weapons and other supplies. And killing innocents in the process of course. These private contracting companies have investors.

    Polls have also indicated that Hillary would win by a very minute margin, smaller than the margin of error on the poll. Polls also indicated that B-man would have defecated on Trump had he been the candidate. Thank you, democrats.
    My dream... is to fly... over the rainbow... so high...


    Cogito ergo sum

    VHS is like a book? and a book is like a stack of kindles.
    Hey, I'm in a movie!
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fYdwe3ArFWA
  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by Jack Sawyer View Post
    All he has to do is denounce and reject them. Simply tell them to fuck off. And yet for some reason he can't. And that is the point where the news people try to guess as to why. Why the fuck would he not tell the nazis to fuck off?
    Because in American, every citizen, regardless of their political views, has the right to free speech and peaceful assembly. Someone actually took the time to list all the rights that people have, and that one is in the first paragraph. These groups gathered to protest the removal of a statue. They are entirely within their rights to do so. The exact same rules apply to the counter-protesters.

    Just because one side is comprised of people who espouse vile, revolting, and repulsive viewpoints doesn't mean they are any less entitled to express their views on the presence of public monuments.

    With the exception of the vehicular homicide, it would be wrong for the president to dismiss, or condemn, the lawful actions of one side and not the other.

    The media puts Trump in a no-win situation. If he says "Nazis fuck off", then there will be folks who say "well, what about the first amendment?". And if Trump says "They have a right to protest", then there will be folks who say "But they hate black people, that must mean that you hate black people Mr. Trump!"

    It really is concerning to me how many [liberals, democrats, progressives, sjw's...whatever you want to call them] are actually of the belief that it's ok to deny constitutional rights of free speech to people that you don't like by applying an absurd and transparent double standard. Despite being absurd and transparent, the double standard has been embraced by the mainstream.

    -"Hey look there's an angry mob of violent protesters destroying the town of Furgeson, MO"
    -"Yeah, but it's ok cause they're really mad at a white guy"

    -"Hey look, there's an angry mob of violent protesters ransacking the campus of UC Berkley"
    -"Yeah, but they're trying to stop a white guy from talking"

    -"Hey look, there's a group of protesters speaking out against the removal of a civil war statue"
    -"They're white....they shouldn't be allowed to do that!"
  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by Jack Sawyer View Post
    *cough Fox News cough*

    Take off your tinfoil hat wuf. It seems to me that to you anything that comes through the grapevine that isn't pro Trump has to be democratic in nature. So you run into a corner of the internet that would suck Trump's *allegedly* tiny dick ad nauseam. That is the actual eco chamber bruh. So this constant "Fake News" indoctrination actually worked: anything that isn't pro Trump has to be Democratic in origin, and is ergo Fake News.

    In Mass Effect, this would be where Saren actually discovered the effects of Sovereign but still claimed to be in control, which SPOILER ALERT

    Spoiler:
    is a whole lot of bullshit. He was as in control as an alcoholic at a Whisky Factory



    I do remember how much flack Obama got for Jeremiah Wright. And then, nothing happened about that; that actually was a nothingburger. However, this isn't the same. The actual neo-nazis are pro Trump, want to be catered to by trump, vote for Trump, like Trump, sympathize with Trump AND HIS FUCKING VIEWS. The neo Nazis. The Nazis. Nazis, bruh.

    All he has to do is denounce and reject them. Simply tell them to fuck off. And yet for some reason he can't. And that is the point where the news people try to guess as to why. Why the fuck would he not tell the nazis to fuck off? Why can't he condemn them? Why would he specifically cut an anti nazi program?

    https://twitter.com/lifeafterhate/status/879837914036932608

    http://foreignpolicy.com/2017/06/26/dhs-strips-funding-from-group-that-counters-neo-nazi-violence/

    Maybe some of his best friends are black, though.



    Sidenote: Polls indicate his popularity is down the tubes. Actual declared wars and banging the war drums raise popularity. Wars simply serve to raise revenues for private contractors providing the weapons and other supplies. And killing innocents in the process of course. These private contracting companies have investors.

    Polls have also indicated that Hillary would win by a very minute margin, smaller than the margin of error on the poll. Polls also indicated that B-man would have defecated on Trump had he been the candidate. Thank you, democrats.
    I want you to know that I don't want to argue. I would like to clarify two things:

    (1) I don't think that the mainstream media is all Democrats when they are not pro-Trump, but because of how many of them are literally Democrats, how many are married to literal Democrats, how intense their scrutiny of non-Democrat politicians is, how weak their scrutiny of Democrat politicians is, and how their narratives are pretty much always in line with the Democrat narrative.

    (2) I kicked the polls asses once before here. I'm not worried about the current fake polls just like the old fake polls.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •