|
 Originally Posted by boost
Well, why did you fail to convey it's/the study's/the author of the study's message? Why did you instead chose to cherry pick the part that suits your world view?
We were talking about cops killing black people. I mentioned the relevant portions. I only fully perused the article after you asked for it.
Using stats for my arguments isn't really my thing. They can be worth mentioning, but beyond that I don't think they have much value. That may be why I offhandedly presented this. I should have been more thoughtful about it. Frankly I'm not interested in the results either way. How does the phrase go? Something like "You can torture data to tell you anything."
|