I'm just stuck in the middle, and I really don't think there will be a candidate that I can live with voting for. Maybe Warren? Clinton is a hawk, and not only would she be willing to double down on bad overreaching foreign policy, but she'd probably double down on the drug war. I guess Paul is interesting, but he holds some lame small guv'mint (not to be confused with Libertarian small government) positions and I think, beyond that, he'd have to pander too much to the republican base to win the nomination.

The bad things about Warren are just things that make for a mediocre, but benign president. It's the low risk, high potential option.