Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumFTR Community

**** Elections thread *****

Results 1 to 75 of 8309

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Quote Originally Posted by Savy View Post
    It makes perfect sense. You're just getting mad over moral stuff.
    Explain how it makes sense.
  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by Poopadoop View Post
    Explain how it makes sense.
    Person A and Person B are the same except one is contributing money to the economy in that they have it.

    Quote Originally Posted by Poopadoop View Post
    Actually the only moral argument I've heard ITT is that he's a flawed individual because he doesn't work for his money. My question is if someone else doesn't work for their money also, but has a lot more of it, why aren't you outraged about that?
    I'm not outraged by any of it. I don't really care what person A through Z do with their lives. When I say you're mad about the morality of it I moreso mean people having a problem with one person but not the other. I don't think what has been said is any justification of that liking.
    Last edited by Savy; 03-23-2017 at 03:56 PM.
  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by Savy View Post

    I'm not outraged by any of it. I don't really care what person A through Z do with their lives.
    Ooooh, don't make me dig up some post where you slagged Ong for being on benefits.
  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by Poopadoop View Post
    Ooooh, don't make me dig up some post where you slagged Ong for being on benefits.
    Do you want to dig up all the ones where I fully support his decision to do what he wants with his life whilst you're at it? They will be a lot easier to find.
  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by Savy View Post
    Do you want to dig up all the ones where I fully support his decision to do what he wants with his life whilst you're at it? They will be a lot easier to find.
    Ok well you've contradicted yourself then. But if you say this is your current opinion then I'll accept that.
  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by Poopadoop View Post
    Ok well you've contradicted yourself then. But if you say this is your current opinion then I'll accept that.
    I've just got what you meant, I don't feel like holding the position of Ong should be able to doss about on benefits and not thinking that those benefits should exist in the first place are contradictory positions.

    It's not even that I don't think those benefits should exist in the first place I just don't think people should be having to pay for shit they don't want to and that is in essence how this is funded.
    Last edited by Savy; 03-23-2017 at 04:08 PM.
  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by Savy View Post
    Where have I contradicted myself?
    It's possible I'm mistaken, but I thought you had a go at him before for being on benefits. If not then I apologize.
  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by Savy View Post
    I just don't think people should be having to pay for shit they don't want to and that is in essence how this is funded.
    I can sympathize with the idea but ya it's not going to happen really is it. If it did we'd have a lot fewer submarines.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •