|
|
 Originally Posted by Poopadoop
Interesting that a guy who claims to be in the top 6 in a company of 1400 employees
Not what I said. I'm actually in the bottom 6 of the company that owns the company with 1400 employees.
finds it worth his while to play live poker in a casino.
Exactly how much do you think I make? Why wouldn't $40/hour interest me? Is that not interesting to you? How much do you make?
That is about a boring a thing as I've ever done in my life
Your IQ is too low to see how interesting the game really is.
Also funny that someone who runs finances for a major company has no concept whatsoever of sample size, or standard deviation, or anything related to statistics. It's like he skipped math class to take Excel class.
You must not play very much live poker either. Standard deviation is a non-existent concept. People play such huge junk ranges pre-flop, and force themselves to fold with a frequency that is reliably profitable. If variance becomes an issue, it means that folks are adjusting to you....but that almost never happens.
Also I like the argument about live winrates that ' someone online credible poker coaches said it could be done',
Fixed our post
therefore 'i'm doing it',
Another erroneous post. Why "therefore"? The two aren't connected, they're independent corroborating data points.
and furthermore 'i don't have to listen to what some other guy online a clueless troll says about it.'
Fixed that one too.
lol, that's real convincing logic there.
What's "lol" is that Savy thinks he can educate me on sample size, when his own conclusions are based on a sample size of 0. That's real convincing logic right there. LOL
|
Reply With Quote