|
|
 Originally Posted by Poopadoop
No, that's what YOUR doing.
False
First, you haven't provided any data yourself that disputes the GG chart.
So? I'm not trying to dispute the GG chart. I'm disputing the gigantic logical leaps you're taking to explain what it means.
Second, you haven't actually demonstrated an understanding of what the chart says
No, I haven't inferred anything more than what the chart says. Not the same thing.
which basically means your position can be summed up as 'I don't agree with what it shows therefore somehow it's wrong, and here's some nonsense arguments based on my misunderstanding of the chart.'
I've posed some very clear questions challenging the conclusions that YOU are drawing from the chart. Rather than answer them, your only response has been "Well...uhhh....you must not know what the chart means". Which means that your position can be summed up as "This chart is flimsy but it's the only evidence I have to support my argument, so I'll just treat it like scripture and ridicule anyone who challenges it"
|
Reply With Quote