|
 Originally Posted by BananaStand
Is there a compelling reason not to??
More than have already been presented?
 Originally Posted by BananaStand
Yep, it appears we have the same google machine.
Yes, the difference being that I try to understand what I read before putting it in a thread trying to make arguments
 Originally Posted by BananaStand
No one is disputing the dishonesty. What seems to be in dispute...is the man's intent. You see "sinister villain". I see "idiot".
It seems that law enforcement and the justice system agree with me. So, why are you right and we're all wrong?
OJ did it
 Originally Posted by BananaStand
hey meted out a punishment that was commensurate with a non-nefarious intent. Corrected the behavior, and now it's not a problem anymore. The system worked....so what's your beef?
I don't really know what my beef is, you know. Maybe it's the fact that he willfully and intentionally tried to deceive the public with something so crucial as ownership of a gambling site (as you know superusers are still a thing [POTRIPPER anyone?]), or that it's gambling (by every definition of the action except current laws apparently simply refuse to recognize this) aimed at kids, or that once caught he deflected, still denying ownership, and then eventually owned up to it with apologies claiming "I didn't know", or the fact that these assholes got off with nary a slap on the wrist whereas if one steals fruit from a store you can go to jail for a long longass time
I just don't know what my beef is with this particular situation. Never really been a CSGO player
|