|
|
 Originally Posted by CoccoBill
No one. Figuring out the right path and the correct steps to get there is science. I far trust the collective human knowledge and understanding here over individuals.
Do you find it ironic that science is fundamentally free market?
Since you do not want individuals with too much power, why do you support a system that explicitly requires a set of individuals having too much power?
Is there room for a different system, one that has demonstrated uncountable times over, that it engages human knowledge and understanding better than any others yet tried?
|
Reply With Quote