Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumFTR Community

Ayn Rand Philosophy, Objectivism, Science, Self-interest

Results 1 to 75 of 159

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    MadMojoMonkey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    10,456
    Location
    St Louis, MO
    Because, frankly, if the theory of economics starts with, "People are batshit crazy and random, but we need to figure out how to be more awesome in this morass while being also batshit crazy and random." then I can at least agree with the first principles.
  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by MadMojoMonkey View Post
    Because, frankly, if the theory of economics starts with, "People are batshit crazy and random, but we need to figure out how to be more awesome in this morass while being also batshit crazy and random." then I can at least agree with the first principles.
    The assumption is that actions come from preferences. Maybe somebody can have batshit crazy or random preferences, but the claim of rationality is that it's the preference being acted upon.

    How can you resolve that "maximize their utility" essentially means "do whatever they feel like doing?"
    Utility is preference. Maximized utility would be always acting on preference. The basic assumption of rational behavior is that people always act on preference.

    I won't argue against rationality being a poor choice of word. I mean, since it's confusing, there's the proof in the pudding right there that it's a poor choice of words. The reason the discussion of rationality emerges on this forum is somebody points out an example of dumb or inefficient behavior and says that's evidence against the assumption of rationality. I say this isn't evidence against rationality because the dumb or inefficient behavior was still based on preference.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •