Quote Originally Posted by mojo
So which one gives the "real" Planck Length? Why is that the one?
I have no idea, but maybe you can translate this into something I can grasp...




The whole discussion begs the question: If ℏ
is so convenient, why do we have h
around?


As usual, "historical reasons".


Planck originally invented h
as a proportionality constant. The problem he was solving was blackbody radiation, for which the experimental data came from spectroscopy people. And spectroscopy people used ν
(for frequency, for that or wavelengths were what they measured). So the data was tabulated in frequency. So, when he formulated his postulate, he used E=nhν
for his quantization.


In modern theory, we prefer working with ω
rather than ν
, because it is annoying to write sin(2πνt)
rather that sin(ωt)
. With angular frequencies, the quantization postulate becomes:


E=nh2πω


Now life sucks. So we invented the shorthand:


E=nℏω