Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumFTR Community

**Ask a monkey a physics question thread**

Results 1 to 75 of 2535

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Quote Originally Posted by OngBonga View Post
    cocco might have nailed it.
    Doesn't each foot have to be moving in the opposite direction for that to work? I dunno about anyone else, but last I checked that's not what happens when you walk.

    But hey, don't let reason dissuade you from the chance to turn down a Nobel Prize
  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by Poopadoop View Post
    Doesn't each foot have to be moving in the opposite direction for that to work? I dunno about anyone else, but last I checked that's not what happens when you walk.

    But hey, don't let reason dissuade you from the chance to turn down a Nobel Prize
    No, you just need one foot to be more "north" than the other, meaning different rates of rotation around the earth's axis.
    Quote Originally Posted by wufwugy View Post
    ongies gonna ong
  3. #3
    MadMojoMonkey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    10,456
    Location
    St Louis, MO
    Quote Originally Posted by Poopadoop View Post
    Doesn't each foot have to be moving in the opposite direction for that to work? I dunno about anyone else, but last I checked that's not what happens when you walk.
    Walking is when you swing your legs in an opposing pendular fashion and oscillate your hips so that you transfer weight to the "backward" moving leg on each legs swing cycle, so that your CG moves forward.

    Your legs are always moving in opposite directions relative to each other, or stationary w.r.t each other when you're walking.

    I mean. Your point still works because when your right leg is moving forward you have angular momentum one way, but when your left leg is moving forward, you have angular momentum the other way, so on average, the net angular momentum is 0 kgm^2/s... unless you always twirl in circles when you walk, which would be entertaining, but socially awkward, I imagine.

    ***
    In inertial reference frames, so long as 2 objects are changing their position relative to each other, then there is (are) some reference frame(s) in which those objects are moving in opposite directions (at least along the line which connects their CG's).

    If we allow for relativistic and accelerating reference frames, then whether or not any 2 objects are moving w.r.t. each other is a matter of perspective. So the matter that objects which are not moving w.r.t. each other are never moving in opposite directions doesn't even hold.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •