|  | 
			
			
			
					
					
			
				
					
						Recommend me a Lewin video
 
 
	It's dismal science stuff, for sure.  Not experimental science stuff.  Ofc all sciences are experimental, just some are near impossible for us to run experiments on
		
			
			
				
					  Originally Posted by MadMojoMonkey   This sounds like another case of "i don't know" to "It must be" with no steps in between. 
 Anyways, my point is that if we compile everything we understand about physics and biology and everything, I think we will find it would be very peculiar and perhaps entirely impossible for there to exist an alien species with strong galactic expansion behavior
 
 
 
	Ah that makes more sense now.  Granted, I thought Schroedinger's cat and Twin Paradox are called paradoxes because they are legitimately sound paradoxes where new information changes nothing.  What I understand about Schroedinger's isn't that we don't have enough information to know the state of the cat, but that we can't have enough information to know the state of the cat.  Whereas Fermi's seems simply to be a question with poor assumptions and the answer comes with new information.
		
			
			
				
					  Originally Posted by MadMojoMonkey   It is well worth noting that humans have observed only the tiniest bit  of the universe, and that questions which seem like paradoxes are common  in this stage of observation.  Think of all the "paradoxes" surrounding  QM and GR.  Schroedinger's cat, the Twin Paradox, etc.  None of them is  truly a paradox, they just present information in a misleading way, and  that presentation implies false assumptions.
 In time, the Fermi Paradox will likely be revealed to be no paradox at  all (based on the observation that all explained physical paradoxes have  all been shown to be false).  Unfortunately, that time scale could be  millions of years.
 
 I would find it strange today to hear physicists give much credence to Fermi's.  Relative to scale, the galaxy isn't teeming with life (and never could), and there are a million other reasons why advanced life wouldn't/couldn't expand beyond their solar systems.
 
 
 RE: Panspermia.  If Occam's Razor was ever needed, it's here.  The probability of a planet creating its own life is probably immeasurably higher than it being brought by an asteroid created from a different star.
 |