|
|
 Originally Posted by CoccoBill
There's also nothing fundamentally different about living and non-living tissue.
... except that one is alive and one is not. That seems to be a strikingly fundamental difference. Is there a biologist in the house?
Also, given the inability to measure all qualities of even a single particle (e.g. the position and momentum) simultaneously to arbitrary precision, I don't think the statement that the living and dead tissue are identical is meaningful. At least, it's not a meaningful question to a physicist.
Stephen Colbert: In 10 words or less, why is there something instead of nothing?
Neil DeGrasse Tyson: Words that make questions might not be questions at all.
|
Reply With Quote