|
|
 Originally Posted by BananaStand
I don't know dude. That all really sounds like a lot of maybes and excuses.
Still sounds to me like doing the exact same experiment will yield two different results based on whether or not certain parts of that experiment are being observed.
That's spooky fucking shit!
This is mostly spot on, actually.
I mean,there are no maybes* or excuses, but it does sound like I'm making stuff up.
Like I said: There's no reason you should believe hearsay on the internet, whether from me or colonel Sanders in spandex.
It is spooky. There are more spooky aspects to quantum, too.
Check out the EPR paradox.
*OK, saying that the position and momentum of all the things are actually best described by squaring a complex-valued probability density function, then integrating that over some domain - that sounds dangerously close to maybes... but it's really not. That probability density function is well-defined and repeated experiments continue to confirm its utility.
|
Reply With Quote