I once told you a personal, first-hand story where I was definitely acting in a manner absolutely contrary to your economic definition of being a rational actor and you ignore it. The example was only economic in the sense that I wanted to do one thing, but did the exact opposite thing out of rote habit.

You (wuf) actively ignore data which contradicts your theories.

This is not common in economists I've been having conversations with. They are ready to explore the fuzzy boundaries of these statements you make, and I think you'll be a much more excellent economist when you see the fuzz, too.