Somewhat going off on a tangent here, and not really sure where I'm headed.

But it's odd that owners of capital and land use labour.

Owners of labour do not use capital or land.

I'm not sure why this is the case.

To produce something you need all 3 and there is an abundance of all 3. Further, the one thing nobody can own originally is land, at least not in the sense that you own your own labour. Yet somehow the one thing you truly own is the thing that other people use.

So say I have land, you have capital and some other guy is not busy so can provide labour, surely the fruits of our joint efforts should be equally owned and distributed. But instead the land owner gains from the growth in value of the land and the rent received. The capital owner gets the profits. Where as the labour provider just gets a wage.

Anyway, like I said, not sure where I'm headed here. Nowhere probably.