So we exploit the desperate and needy to make a profit. That's a major part of capitalism. If we all had enough to feed, clothe, shelter and educate our family this wouldn't be an issue.

I understand what you're saying and don't have an answer on how to do it better. But that doesn't mean the exploitation you refer to should just be considered acceptable. Just because I can't find a better way doesn't mean the current way is right. You must at least acknowledge it leaves a bad taste in your mouth that sone are so rich they have 5 Ferraris and others can't afford to feed their kids.

I don't know the answer. But I know I don't like what you described and I'd happily try an alternative.

I guess we'd get less growth. If we were in a position where we simply didn't have the resources to feed everyone then you'd have to accept that growth should be the priority. But as we already can, we could accept a slower rate of growth for the sake of better distribution.