|
|
 Originally Posted by OngBonga
But the information it gained was a single move ahead, it can anticipate this move and already know it's not winning.
The reason it's different is because it's constantly learning, it evaluated a move then it happened and could see further so when the move was repeated it then saw a better option. There is also the fact that it might realise that if it plays move A and the other player doesn't play the exact perfect move it's more winning and if it does it's repeated therefore playing move A first before trying the next best option of B is a better play.
There are loads of reasons and literally none of it is trying to exploit how the player plays.
Originally Posted by spoonitnow
Stockfish wasn't allowed to use opening books, which is an important part of the story you're missing in your OP.
How much difference do you think this would make? I've only really seen that a lot of people in the chess community are pretty blown away by it.
It'd be interesting to see how quickly AZ caps out. You'd think the next step would be beating something like stockfish with an opening book.
|
Reply With Quote