Quote Originally Posted by kmind
My initial guess was that hands 1 and 3 worked but I wanted to discuss hand 1 more. This is probably really really basic but I usually bet/fold this turn with two pair but recently I am starting to feel like it's unnecessary. I think I get too scared when draws hit. Is it more correct to assume that villain has a wider range than FDs and that checking the turn with still a lot of equity vs. his whole range is more +EV to get value on the river whether it be c/c or value betting when he checks IP? And say we had a lesser holding then bet/folding the turn is actually better?

Quote Originally Posted by zook
1. Villain is 28/12/1.9 over a 500+ hands. No relevant history.

Full Tilt No-Limit Hold'em, $4.00 BB (6 handed) - Full-Tilt Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com

Hero (Button) ($461.40)
SB ($400)
BB ($436.30)
UTG ($430.50)
MP ($563.60)
CO ($352.30)

Preflop: Hero is Button with 10, J
UTG calls $4, 2 folds, Hero raises to $18, 2 folds, UTG calls $14

Flop: ($42) 4, 10, J (2 players)
UTG checks, Hero bets $34, UTG calls $34

Turn: ($110) K (2 players)
UTG checks, Hero checks

River: ($110) 2 (2 players)
UTG bets $110, Hero calls $110

Total pot: $330 | Rake: $3
b/f vs checking turn is marginal either way and depends a lot on our opponent. My standard is probably to b/f especially vs passive stations just because it's so easy for us to play against them and their range is fairly wide (thus we arent necessarily behind their calling range if we can include some KQ, 89,AJ,QJ and other bullshit hands)