fish avatars are, for me, almost as good as HUD sometimes! lol.
Lockpull? what that?
Yeah that's me on my bikey going around Mallory Park. Took that corner at around 90mph, sometimes knee to the ground, sometimes not.
05-15-2009 12:39 PM
#76
| |
fish avatars are, for me, almost as good as HUD sometimes! lol. | |
| |
05-15-2009 02:16 PM
#77
| |
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
there I was thinking the bike had stalled and you were falling ever so slowly off sideways , cursing your bad luck and wondering why you can't beat all the other racers |
05-15-2009 03:37 PM
#78
| |
yeah but there's a difference between going round a corner and going round a corner @ 90, there aren't that many circuits in europe with such corners! twas a specific boast. | |
| |
05-15-2009 05:40 PM
#79
| |
Woah that's pretty sick. I wish I wasn't such a pansy cuz that bike thing looks like fun | |
05-15-2009 06:00 PM
#80
| |
| |
05-16-2009 06:38 PM
#81
| |
sooo, wondering if i played this hand ok. At first i was like, shit, i was way behind here, but now i think i did ok actually... *scratches head* | |
| |
05-16-2009 08:36 PM
#82
| |
I would fold the turn and raise the river | |
05-16-2009 09:19 PM
#83
| |
Untick the option to show results. Turn is probably a fold, river is close. If you raise its to raise/fold, so dont raise unless you're prepared to fold. | |
| |
05-17-2009 01:42 AM
#84
| |
Definitely raise the river here, you are missing so much value out of worse K's that didn't two pair and worse Q's that may or may not have two paired. | |
05-17-2009 07:10 AM
#85
| |
yeeeah. Missed value. I was just concerned, i was putting KQ in their range but then wondered if they'd have raised with that. Some people do limp with AK at these levels. | |
| |
05-17-2009 09:43 AM
#86
| |
I mean decent, but not great. Something like QJ or A9, stuff like that. I raise in the blinds after 2 or more limpers and see a 3 way flop which I miss most of the time v's people who wont fold any part of the board. You can check it out in your HEM filters. When I did I was a pretty decent loser in hands where I raised behind 2+ limpers. | |
| |
05-17-2009 11:43 AM
#87
| |
yeah, especially against loose players. Thing is, we think: ah, we're ahead of their range. But we're also getting called by (often) more than one of those limpers, thus slicing out equity into a smaller piece. | |
| |
05-17-2009 03:41 PM
#88
| |
gaaaah. Monster tilt hangover. | |
| |
05-17-2009 03:55 PM
#89
| |
You must pick good spots to steal blinds. Avoid stealing blinds from shortstacks. I actually avoid shortstacks altogether. Once I started avoiding them, my 10NL game went back on track. | |
| |
05-17-2009 03:57 PM
#90
| |
post the AK hand? | |
| |
05-17-2009 04:52 PM
#91
| |
Have you considered that maybe you're a victim of fancy play syndrome? You're getting frustrated about getting 3 bet or 3 bet light. I play @ $10NL and to date have NEVER worried about my 3 bet % or 3 betting light or getting 3 bet light or anything with the words "3 bet" in it. Those are all advanced concepts that I believe only start to creep into our thought process at the mid-stakes when the competition is much better and you're short handed and you're sitting with deeper stacks. If you have 100BB or less and someone 3 bets you @ $10 NL, shove it if you have AA or KK. Outside of that, don't get caught up in the x bet game - just call or put your raise in and be done with it. That whole concept was born solely because it was tougher to get paid off through conventional means. You don't have to delve very deep to get paid by players at these stakes at this point in time. | |
| |
05-17-2009 06:22 PM
#92
| |
Hey Jason, | |
| |
05-18-2009 07:37 AM
#93
| |
![]() ![]()
|
hey Wonderland I was sitting to your left at 1 table yesterday for about 50 hands (tiny sample size) - the stats I have on you are something like 23/8/0.8 |
05-18-2009 08:24 AM
#94
| |
ah hey there. Should have said hello. | |
| |
05-18-2009 09:16 AM
#95
| |
You have to understand that you diminish your post-flop fold equity by limping. Don't open limp any hands. | |
| |
05-18-2009 01:44 PM
#96
| |
running like a cuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuunt of late. | |
| |
05-18-2009 02:06 PM
#97
| |
explain thought processes on all streets in 2 - 3. i dont wanna hear BUT WAHHHHHHHHHHHH I AM ON A DONWSWING SO wxyz. swings are irrelevant sir, if a play is +EV, its always +EV regardless of how we are "running". if another play is more +EV, its always more +EV. | |
| |
05-18-2009 07:26 PM
#98
| |
AA i'm thinking, fuck, flush, bet anyway. Fuck, he called and fuck, another club. but it's checked so maybe he's scared of it too? river, i'm just wanting value at that stage from weaker hands. Inretrospect i was a bit wedded to the aces. What would other people do here, check them down? | |
| |
05-18-2009 07:54 PM
#99
| |
Guy in the AK hand had an OESD not a gutshot, he definately had odds to call your flop bet there. | |
| |
05-19-2009 03:57 AM
#100
| |
so he has approx 30% chance of hitting. About 4.5:1 and i'm giving him LESS than 2:1?? | |
| |
05-19-2009 04:15 AM
#101
| |
| |
05-19-2009 06:40 AM
#102
| |
stacks, dude, you were the first person to introduce me to implied odds, so i know the score to some degree there | |
| |
05-19-2009 06:58 AM
#103
| |
If you were offered an OESD with those odds and those stack sizes and you folded then you should quit poker, especially if its hidden like that. | |
| |
05-19-2009 02:57 PM
#104
| |
oooh my god | |
| |
05-19-2009 03:19 PM
#105
| |
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Can understand how you feel, I'm up and down all over the place. check out my graph in my op and the hands I ran into. Last night I kept running into slow sets, night before it was slow played aces. I mean limp calling 4 streets and showing no aggression at all even when they hit a set. I'm trying to slow up a bit with top pair/overpair type hands now. |
05-19-2009 03:40 PM
#106
| |
although the moneywas going all in anyway, you played the AA pretty bad. | |
05-19-2009 03:52 PM
#107
| |
wow keith. Swingy indeed. I'm only a few bucks up on you myself since the start of the month/10nl. I'm up like $40 ish. | |
| |
05-19-2009 03:55 PM
#108
| |
the minute you stop blaming every single loss, whether it be a stack or someone calling your cbet when you have air, on negative variance or running bad, is the minute you can start becoming a better poker player. | |
| |
05-19-2009 04:00 PM
#109
| |
u obviously didnt have him ok AK or high PP or why would u check this flop? You mind frame was omg top set, check. O crap few draws, I best shove. if you had him on AK/QQ/KK he would get his money in on this flop. | |
05-19-2009 06:11 PM
#110
| |
FUCKIN YEEEEEEEEEEEHAWWW. | |
| |
05-19-2009 06:46 PM
#111
| |
This is fast becoming the kind of thread people will stop responding to soon. Get your head right or take a break. Running bad is rarely just variance. | |
| |
05-19-2009 06:51 PM
#112
| |
| |
05-19-2009 07:00 PM
#113
| |
Let me guess.. You are playing amazingly both times, at 10nl and 5nl. However, at 10nl you are just running like total shit, but at 5nl you didn't run quite as bad, and that's how you were able to win right? | |
05-19-2009 07:37 PM
#114
| |
Tilt control is a beautiful thing my friend. I wish I could be here over the summer to help you out with it and shit, but since I won't be, you best have your shit straightened up by the time I get back. | |
05-19-2009 10:26 PM
#115
| |
man forget about single session resutls, they are clearly getting to your head. | |
05-20-2009 04:22 AM
#116
| |
ah poker telling offs. | |
| |
05-20-2009 04:25 AM
#117
| |
| |
| |
05-20-2009 04:34 AM
#118
| |
Noones telling you not to post this stuff in your op, what we're saying is that if what you're posting is whats going on in your head, then you're putting yourself into a bad place for trying to be a winning player. If you've read through my op you'll see I also struggle with letting my results rule my emotions at times (and it has a bad effect on me, and I dont think it affects me as much as you). | |
| |
05-20-2009 05:50 AM
#119
| |
To add to bjsaust's post, read this: | |
| |
05-20-2009 06:35 AM
#120
| |
I need EXTRA poker psychology help. Reading the poker mindset is like a drop in the ocean really. I think it's hardly going to affect my game, maybe i need some Tony Robbins hardcore shit. | |
| |
05-21-2009 04:31 AM
#121
| |
STARTED THIS WITH SOME BLOGGING, BUT THERE ARE QUESTIONS BELOW FOR THE MID STAKERS IF YOU WANT TO SKIP AHEAD... | |
| |
05-21-2009 05:51 AM
#122
| |
I'm not a midstakes player yet, but fuck it, ill answer the questions lol. | |
05-21-2009 12:37 PM
#123
| |
| |
| |
05-21-2009 08:32 PM
#124
| |
Well, technically 50-200nl would still be called smallstakes, but to answer: | |
| |
05-21-2009 08:37 PM
#125
| |
| |
| |
05-21-2009 10:01 PM
#126
| |
1. How do your emotions get affected by winning? Large pot, session etc. Like short time frame. | |
05-22-2009 07:08 AM
#127
| |
Cool, thanks to the small (or relatively mid) stakers for their input. Was quite extensive. Overall a sense of... almost apathy? am i right in saying that? | |
| |
05-22-2009 07:35 AM
#128
| |
You have to realise the swings are just part of the story. For instance my 'hero story' atm is running at about 25bb/100 since I moved to 100nl. My first 25k hands this year I ran at about 0bb/100. The full story is I'm running at 4.5bb/100 (thats 2.25 ptbb/100) over almost 100k hands in my DB. Except even thats not the full story, theres all the poker from before I started using HEM, and theres all the poker still to go. How I'm playing now has nothing in common with how I played say 50k hands ago. Its almost impossible to get the full story, theres only here and now. | |
| |
05-22-2009 11:22 AM
#129
| |
I think it's best just to not have any expectations at all in regards to moving up. From the moment I deposited $100 and started playing $2NL, now @ $10NL, and in the future wherever I end up, I have a healthy respect that I may not be able to beat the stake I'm playing at, yet always do my best to be a winner and the best winner I can be. If you start thinking you'll move up after this number of hands or that number of days, you're more likely to be disappointed. Just worry about the quality of your play. | |
| |
05-22-2009 05:38 PM
#130
| |
![]()
|
|
| |
05-22-2009 09:24 PM
#131
| |
Dayum. | |
| |
05-23-2009 12:57 AM
#132
| |
It would probably be a mistake for him to fold there, but lol at him c/r'ing. | |
| |
05-23-2009 01:12 AM
#133
| |
| |
05-23-2009 05:17 AM
#134
| |
Stacks, that's an excellent point actually. | |
| |
05-23-2009 05:24 AM
#135
| |
| |
| |
05-23-2009 05:36 AM
#136
| |
well, i mean i DO but i guess this is a good example of how to very much narrow things down. That said, this villain only had 2 hands on me here so he shouldn't just assume i'm not limp/calling AA. People do. | |
| |
05-23-2009 05:47 AM
#137
| |
| |
| |
05-23-2009 08:32 AM
#138
| |
wonderland, can you make me a sweet avatar like yours? | |
05-23-2009 08:38 AM
#139
| |
f the haterz, you da bomb yo, keep doin what ya doin | |
05-23-2009 08:39 AM
#140
| |
| |
05-23-2009 08:46 AM
#141
| |
| |
| |
05-23-2009 08:51 AM
#142
| |
u can watch me play some time, i g2 sleep now though | |
05-23-2009 09:16 AM
#143
| |
| |
| |
05-24-2009 06:09 AM
#144
| |
Just reading Spoonitnow's infamous BR management for people with balls. | |
| |
05-24-2009 08:59 AM
#145
| |
just pm me some times u r available, i can watch u if u like or play like 20nl or 10nl | |
05-24-2009 02:23 PM
#146
| |
![]() ![]()
|
|
05-24-2009 03:41 PM
#147
| |
With that said...if you're looking to make alot of money, you're better off going to business school, getting some sort of financial designation, and then kissing ass and doing whatever you can to get into upper management. | |
05-24-2009 04:31 PM
#148
| |
![]() ![]()
|
Quite. My post was saying something closer to the point that you just made than you might think. |
05-24-2009 04:40 PM
#149
| |
| |
05-24-2009 04:50 PM
#150
| |
| |