Self Control

Small stakes cash is nothing but a waste of time. SitnGo's, because you can't lose more than what you bought in for, protect you from your worst poker enemy. But even so, 20% rake SNGs are a waste of time too if it's a roll you are trying to build.

And now to the question: who is your worst poker enemy, young grasshoppers?

Originally Posted by Jack Sawyer

Small stakes cash is nothing but a waste of time. SitnGo's, because you can't lose more than what you bought in for, protect you from your worst poker enemy. But even so, 20% rake SNGs are a waste of time too if it's a roll you are trying to build.

And now to the question: who is your worst poker enemy, young grasshoppers?

So, Mr. Sawyer, if we can't answer the question (who is your worst poker enemy) for the grasshopper, beacause we are merely crickets, is there a better or worse game between the two, sit-n-goes or cash? I'm asking because I can't f'in get beyond 5NL and it's pissing me off. It seems to be a matter of 1 or 2 big hands per/1k that can destroy the BR.

Sorry Dr. for imposing.