Operation Poker Reset

He wasn't a nit. If he was, he would have probably 3-bet me with A-K or any big pair. No, I'm convinced my read was correct in this case. I am able to lay down top pair here if I feel the action indicates it. Most people with trips there would just call and let me hang myself on the turn. Especially at this level. I think a min-reraise there means Ax nearly every time, at least against this type of opponent.

Originally Posted by tuuk2

He wasn't a nit. If he was, he would have probably 3-bet me with A-K or any big pair. No, I'm convinced my read was correct in this case. I am able to lay down top pair here if I feel the action indicates it. Most people with trips there would just call and let me hang myself on the turn. Especially at this level. I think a min-reraise there means Ax nearly every time, at least against this type of opponent.

tuuk - keep up the good work. I bet your playing pretty well and with time it'll reward you

As for the 66 hand, it's actually -EV to set mine in a 3bet pot 100bb deep vs. non-nits. Just something to keep in mind. Obviously a cooler/bad beat postflop .

Originally Posted by kmind

tuuk - keep up the good work. I bet your playing pretty well and with time it'll reward you

As for the 66 hand, it's actually -EV to set mine in a 3bet pot 100bb deep vs. non-nits. Just something to keep in mind. Obviously a cooler/bad beat postflop .

Really? I thought that it would be the right play in that situation. If I hit a set, I'd most likely get it all in the middle, if not, it's an easy fold. Are you saying that I should only be trying this with a higher pair? I'm really curious. Perhaps I've been doing it wrong all this time...