|
|
 Originally Posted by Micro2Macro
so yeah, it seriously took me >500k hands to learn not to bluff people who can't fold.
similar, but it's taking me longer... and add "not to call with bluff catchers vs people who can't bluff"
Originally Posted by Micro2Macro
like let's say villain checks the river to us. his range is XXY. he will only call a river shove if you he has Y. you shove for pot and you have a +EV bluff. now let's say his range is still XXY, but he snaps off your shove with everything - well its obvious we can't bluff, even if we KNOW X is like 2nd or 3rd pair. so sometimes a player will check their entire range on the river, and when we're left with a PSB all we have to do is determine whether we're value betting or bluffing given what we anticipate his calling range to be.
ok I just rambled about obvious random stuff and I may have screwed up my explanation on what I said, but yeah disregard this I guess I've been grinding like 8+ hours a day to get Supernova so I'm kinda burnt out. I realize I went out of line in regards to what you said daven. I think you and I think about poker differently though, like our pattern of thought is different, but we seem to end up arriving at the same conclusion. Interesting, but I think it's true for anyone really.
i think that writing long rambling poker discourses is +++EV for the person doing the writing. And reading them and thinking about the content and context is also +EV most of the time. As for out of line - nope. And the pattern of thought thing is likely to be terminology as much as anything. by the way, the xxy explanation above is good - that paragraph would stand alone as a post in the beginners circle. Post it.
Originally Posted by Micro2Macro
[x] people are stations at small stakes too, not just micros
[x] you can't force people to fold
[x] m2m took forever to learn this
[x] m2m is getting Supernova
vnh
|
Reply With Quote