|
Villain is 50/28 with an AF of 2 over about 100 hands.
Pre seems std, as for the flop, I don't want to over-rep here by raising; I'm not raising the nuts here very often if ever, and I'll sometimes, but rarely, raise sets here for balance / deception. Regardless, I call, and it's doubtful he'd even be aware of such tendencies.
Turn, I think I probably should have bet here; primarily as a means to get value from worse flushes, but also for creating fold equity against AsXsXX in the event of the board pairing on the river. Villain's deep enough to fold to a 2/3 psb on river if he calls a bet on turn. As for sizing I'd go something like 1/2 on this street.
If board pairs I figure worse flushes might give a crying call some non-zero percentage of the time, enough to make bet/folding the turn profitable.
Anyway, I don't bet the turn. River is just fucking weird. Is it not legitimate to think that he'd lead all of his nut hands here? Or have I played passively enough (given turn) to convince him that the only way to milk me is to check and hope I bet?
At any rate, once he check-raises, this is a fold, yes? Obviously my bet was designed to get some value from weaker flushes and rarely, other hands. Any chance he raises as a bluff here with any frequency?
$0.05/$0.10 Pot Limit Omaha Hi
PokerStars
5 Players
Hand Conversion Powered by weaktight.com
Stacks:
UTG ($12.65) 127bb
CO ($9.64) 96bb
Hero (BTN) ($10) 100bb
SB ($19.25) 193bb
BB ($8.13) 81bb
Pre-Flop: ($0.15, 5 players) Hero is BTN
UTG raises to $0.35, CO calls $0.35, Hero calls $0.35, SB calls $0.30, BB calls $0.25
Flop: ($1.75, 5 players)
SB bets $1, 3 folds, Hero calls $1
Turn: ($3.75, 2 players)
SB checks, Hero checks
River: ($3.75, 2 players)
SB checks, Hero bets $1.80, SB raises to $8.98 ...
|