inelastic... I learned a new word!

It's also interesting to take such an in depth approach to c-bet sizing. That said, I think this can go further. Would it make sense to come to some sort of happy medium in the second case? The most obvious would be a weighted average (.3*8.5)+(.7*21.3) = 17.46 or 18bb, leaving a pot of 61.5 and a stack of 71.5, SPR ~ 1.1:1. I don't think that's the way to go about it really, maybe a 30% of the time we do this with both ranges and 70% of the time we do that with both ranges? It seems like a lot of trouble for balance...

Ah forget it, I'm not helping. Definitely post the final version.