|
|
 Originally Posted by Savy
I can't see it, these things get called off very quickly when it impacts a persons ability to make money which I assume he does during Wimbledon. The story sounded a bit false to be too but based on the decision it sounds more so as if he's full of shit than the other party. Having to wait till bankruptcy was on you until you when you have a house that could pay it off (or a large bit of it), nah.
Agree. I would think he could also transfer the asset to the creditor too, or at least let them place a legal charge on it. Same goes for his house in Wimbledon. Maybe property law prevents that, or the creditor wouldn't entertain it. Not my area of expertise unfortunately.
I did half think that maybe this story on HSDB this week wasn't so coincidental though:
https://www.highstakesdb.com/7946-bu...er-losses.aspx
|
Reply With Quote