NH
yeah, its all about the long term. Over short term, luck is king; but in the long term, luck is replaced by skill.
|
10-09-2007 12:17 AM
#151
| |
NH | |
| |
|
10-09-2007 12:25 AM
#152
| |
| |
| |
|
10-09-2007 12:32 AM
#153
| |
~+$25 as of right now, I'm still playing, and I think you are right on | |
| |
|
10-09-2007 12:36 AM
#154
| |
| |
| |
|
10-09-2007 12:40 AM
#155
| |
I haven't bluffed in a while | |
| |
|
10-09-2007 01:15 AM
#156
| |
tourney hh's? OMG MY EYES! | |
| |
|
10-09-2007 01:44 AM
#157
| |
LOL, and I got more! | |
| |
|
10-09-2007 02:35 AM
#158
| |
|
|
| |
|
10-09-2007 02:44 AM
#159
| |
Hmm, its contributed rake, right? I expected dealt. | |
| |
|
10-09-2007 02:54 AM
#160
| |
|
|
|
10-09-2007 10:12 AM
#161
| |
ya ub bonus sucks at low limits and it is def no fish fest. jack you are non-us right? if so, have you looked into the ongame sites yet? back when i was grinding a bankroll a year ago the ongame network was a goldmine (in bonus terms and soft game terms). i haven't checked but if they are still doing things the same then it's almost impossible to be playing without a bonus there. | |
| |
|
10-09-2007 10:25 AM
#162
| |
I'm gonna check out Ongame. | |
| |
|
10-09-2007 10:29 AM
#163
| |
LOL they are, nice autolinks | |
| |
|
10-09-2007 11:04 AM
#164
| |
How about the Boss Network? | |
| |
|
10-09-2007 11:45 AM
#165
| |
lol @ your omaha hand | |
| |
|
10-09-2007 02:55 PM
#166
| |
![]()
|
OMG Jack, |
|
10-09-2007 03:12 PM
#167
| |
| |
|
10-09-2007 03:13 PM
#168
| |
| |
|
10-10-2007 03:37 AM
#169
| |
|
|
|
10-10-2007 09:57 AM
#170
| |
K guys, thanx for all the advice, I'll be making my account at tower. | |
| |
|
10-11-2007 01:59 AM
#171
| |
sweet action 1500 hand session and i'm up 0.75! woo hoo! prob made about $7.50 in rb though lol. here's today's fun hand... | |
| |
|
10-11-2007 04:21 AM
#172
| |
WOW | |
| |
|
10-12-2007 01:04 AM
#173
| |
Weeeeeeeeeee, I'm on tower | |
| |
|
10-12-2007 01:22 AM
#174
| |
| |
| |
|
10-12-2007 01:40 AM
#175
| |
| |
| |
|
10-12-2007 02:05 AM
#176
| |
| |
| |
|
10-12-2007 03:13 AM
#177
| |
in case anyone was wondering, this is how not to play kings | |
| |
|
10-12-2007 06:14 AM
#178
| |
LOL | |
| |
|
10-12-2007 11:44 AM
#179
| |
that was a really bad KK. love dem dummies. | |
| |
|
10-12-2007 02:30 PM
#180
| |
I'm playing the deepstacked 10NL, though I refer to it as 20NL. Were you playing at BBJ tables? That would explain why so many people were buying in short. | |
| |
|
10-12-2007 08:45 PM
#181
| |
yes. and i suspected that would be the case. but, i am also working off a reload, and wanted to see how it affects my RB acct. | |
| |
|
10-13-2007 02:10 AM
#182
| |
I'll be there shortly, in about 20 days. About the time I need to clear the tower bonus. I'll be well over $1,000 then hopefully | |
| |
|
10-13-2007 11:19 PM
#183
| |
|
dude. Check Empire. More free money, I didn't get an e-mail but check my account there occasionally. |
| |
|
10-16-2007 05:43 AM
#184
| |
Yeah, I saw that. Couldn't get there in time. I was clearing a tower bonus. | |
| |
|
10-16-2007 05:28 PM
#185
| |
God I love PKR | |
| |
|
10-17-2007 01:04 AM
#186
| |
|
|
| |
|
10-17-2007 03:11 AM
#187
| |
Deleted by myself | |
| |
|
10-17-2007 03:12 AM
#188
| |
oh and grats jack on your success | |
| |
|
10-17-2007 05:53 AM
#189
| |
| |
| |
|
10-17-2007 05:55 AM
#190
| |
| |
| |
|
10-17-2007 10:56 AM
#191
| |
![]()
|
So, what's your sn on tower? |
|
10-17-2007 12:09 PM
#192
| |
I just spoke to a PKR rep | |
| |
|
10-17-2007 12:11 PM
#193
| |
| |
| |
|
10-17-2007 12:25 PM
#194
| |
ok im done whining in your op jack...sorry man | |
| |
|
10-17-2007 12:48 PM
#195
| |
| |
| |
|
10-17-2007 12:58 PM
#196
| |
![]()
|
|
|
10-17-2007 11:35 PM
#197
| |
LOL, if we meet you'll know | |
| |
|
10-18-2007 02:51 AM
#198
| |
|
|
|
10-18-2007 02:52 AM
#199
| |
If you are talking about river, I don't think that's a vbet. Seems like he either has a K or draw which missed. But I suck at Omaha/any form of poker. I'm not seeing much you beat that he calls with on the river. Turn I would bet though. | |
|
10-18-2007 07:16 AM
#200
| |
Yup, turn. I don't know what he had, but I'm guessing 99% FD | |
| |
|
10-18-2007 09:11 PM
#201
| |
Hand of the day: | |
| |
|
10-20-2007 02:40 PM
#202
| |
PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em Tourney, Big Blind is t200 (9 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: FlopTurnRiver Cards) | |
| |
|
10-21-2007 12:55 PM
#203
| |
Ok | |
| |
|
10-21-2007 01:17 PM
#204
| |
| |
| |
|
10-21-2007 02:05 PM
#205
| |
Someone explain the HUD for pussies argument please. How can this be a bad thing when you take notes on your opponents and have this as a bonus for your reads? I am really eager because if I hear valid points then I'll stop using it. | |
|
10-21-2007 02:19 PM
#206
| |
Quick answer: You'll become dependant. Your decisions are then going to be heavily distorted when you don't/can't have a hud. Try using it on Cake Poker (or in a live game) | |
| |
|
10-21-2007 05:37 PM
#207
| |
Thanks. Eagerly awaiting the more detailed response. | |
|
10-21-2007 08:45 PM
#208
| |
Here goes: | |
| |
|
10-21-2007 09:11 PM
#209
| |
| |
| |
|
10-21-2007 11:08 PM
#210
| |
I see your points but I think this is general assumptions. For me, personally, a HUD only adds to reads as I take notes all the time on villains. | |
|
10-22-2007 12:31 AM
#211
| |
And I bubble again. Goddamn 4,40's! | |
| |
|
10-22-2007 01:43 AM
#212
| |
|
|
|
10-22-2007 02:42 AM
#213
| |
| |
| |
|
10-22-2007 02:45 AM
#214
| |
| |
| |
|
10-23-2007 10:38 PM
#215
| |
Ladies and gentlemen, boys and girls, my dear and beloved readers and buddies... | |
| |
|
10-23-2007 11:15 PM
#216
| |
| |
|
10-24-2007 01:13 AM
#217
| |
nice going jack. really cool man. hopefully within a couple weeks i'll be back on board at 25nl with about 25-30 buy-ins praying for some hands to hold up lol. | |
| |
|
10-24-2007 02:23 AM
#218
| |
I think spots like this one where top pair (usually T or higher) pairs on the turn are great to bluff on since people don't normally check top pair on the flop, and even if they think I am bluffing they have to commit a lot of chips to find out. Thoughts? | |
| |
|
10-24-2007 03:20 AM
#219
| |
Before bluffing, you have to analyze first if the pot is worth bluffing at. | |
| |
|
10-24-2007 08:01 AM
#220
| |
Congrats, Jack. Keep us posted, and do something with those tourney dollars FFS. | |
| |
|
10-24-2007 12:18 PM
#221
| |
| |
| |
|
10-24-2007 02:01 PM
#222
| |
I only bluff at small pots to set up future plays, but the actual value of the pot is trivial for me (as in, if I expect to bluff and win the small pot). In fact, in omaha I bluff at small pots all the time, but only to set up the future plays, not intentionally to scoop up the current pot. | |
| |
|
10-24-2007 03:32 PM
#223
| |
i'm not sure what you mean by bluffing only to set up future plays. if you mean that it helps you keep up an aggressive image i can agree with that, but to me that's a side effect. in the hand i posted i have to win the pot at least 58% of the time for the play to be +EV (i think i win much more often than that). shouldn't our decisions in each hand be guided by what is most +EV? | |
| |
|
10-24-2007 10:36 PM
#224
| |
Bluff to set up future plays: | |
| |
|
10-26-2007 04:13 AM
#225
| |
Well I guess it's just not possible for me to not run like absolute crap. I know I wasn't gonna whine anymore but I just went through an 11 buy-in downswing at 10NL. You'd think I'm the worst player ever. I just don't get it. I feel like a freaking psychic sometimes. I am so much better than these guys. I get these loser donkeys into the worst spots and they gladly try to give me their chips. Their terrible play being constantly rewarded combined with set under set 3 times = me losing $110 at 10NL. I really can't believe it. I'm at a loss for words. | |
| |