Quote Originally Posted by Jason
It's been about 2 and a 1/2 months and 43k hands since I started playing $50NL and I now have the bankroll to start playing $100NL.
congrats
Quote Originally Posted by Jason
Even for players who could routinely and soundly beat $50NL for a high win-rate, I couldn't help but think they could probably beat $25NL for more than twice as much.
initially, for sure. but short-term vs long-term, you wrote that already but i'm repeating it anyway...

Quote Originally Posted by Jason
is a good idea to play across multiple stakes and to not think of yourself as JUST a $200NL player or JUST a $50NL player. Instead, be open to several stakes so long as you are bankrolled to play them
this is something i am becoming more aware of. Especially when i see the 5-10/3-6 regs at 1-2 when the higher games aren't running.

[quote="Jason"]#2, Bankroll management rules don't give me much flexibility at the beginning of a stake due to the 5% stop loss[/qoute]
i don't think i follow/like this rule. I have lost >5% a few times i guess? if i was following this rule then i would never move up with less than 60buyins, then again, i don't anyway...

Quote Originally Posted by Jason
Even IF and when I move up to $100NL, I will probably continue play both $50NL and $100NL for a while to pick the juiciest games of both stakes. I don't know what the games will be like, so it's still possible $25NL will be an option
don't be mixing 25nl and 100nl. Not good for your head at all. Also, i'd say that 50% of FR tables running at 100nl on FT have at least one uber-fish and a bunch of mediocre-at-best players. Very few are full of solid-for-the-stakes players. If you can't find good tables then you're probably not that good at spotting fish and/or way too picky.