1,041 hands, -$221.05
![]()
Bankroll: $1,220.88
10-27-2007 08:49 PM
#76
| |
1,041 hands, -$221.05 | |
| |
10-27-2007 11:19 PM
#77
| |
314 hands, -$128.55 | |
| |
10-28-2007 06:04 AM
#78
| |
![]() ![]()
|
I gotta say I was reading the last dozen or so posts thinking "when is he going to hit a cooler"? 7 buyins - ouch, and I know: |
10-28-2007 11:40 AM
#79
| |
Yeah, very familiar. | |
| |
10-28-2007 12:32 PM
#80
| |
![]() ![]()
|
Hehe. But, as you know, it's all part of the learning process - in this case, it's teaching your psyche to be more resilient, accustomising you to the substantial losses you're likely to experience weekly or more from now on. |
10-28-2007 12:44 PM
#81
| |
GL, dude! I'm playing stars $50 at the mo too. I'm finding it good | |
10-28-2007 01:02 PM
#82
| |
Yeah, I've played in the Gauntlet every Wednesday this season. Bigred knocked me out of the first 2 with coinflips. 3rd game I played badly and donked out. Then last week I got crippled with KK < 88, then lost a coinflip (can't remember what it was) then QKs < T9s to finish me off. | |
| |
10-28-2007 01:07 PM
#83
| |
| |
| |
10-28-2007 01:33 PM
#84
| |
Lol, you could have picked a better hand than that! k thanks | |
10-28-2007 02:21 PM
#85
| |
271 hands, +$70.25 | |
| |
10-30-2007 08:32 PM
#86
| |
I've been busy with life lately and haven't logged many hands. I did deposit $500 at FTP (ePass wouldn't let me do 600) but I've only played 20 or so hands, lost about $5 and for some reason can't get the hand histories to work properly. I've contacted customer support, and I don't intend to play there anymore until it gets resolved. I really really love Poker Tracker, and reviewing my sessions has become a ritual that I can't stand breaking. | |
| |
10-31-2007 05:24 AM
#87
| |
![]() ![]()
|
Hey man, you're doing well, why don't you pop into IRC some time and have a chat? Also Smoking is good for you, my doctor told me so. |
| |
11-01-2007 02:41 PM
#88
| |
I haven't played a single hand since Sunday (unless you count the 2 minutes I spent fiddling with FTP or that rigged FTR tourney). I didn't take this break intentionally, but now that I have I feel refreshed. My batteries are recharged and I can march on to November with a clean slate. My only concern is that I may have gotten a bit rusty. I vaguely recall taking a similar break and playing quite badly for the first few hours of my return. When I resume my journey tonight, I may decide to play just one or two tables to acclimate myself. | |
| |
11-01-2007 04:24 PM
#89
| |
![]() ![]()
|
You could just see how long you go on smoking a fag a day - it's |
11-02-2007 04:28 PM
#90
| |
744 hands, -$187.50 | |
| |
11-03-2007 02:38 AM
#91
| |
1,342 hands, +$217.60 | |
| |
11-03-2007 04:05 AM
#92
| |
| |
11-04-2007 02:56 PM
#93
| |
847 hands, +$165.05 | |
| |
11-05-2007 01:59 AM
#94
| |
205 hands, +$76.30 | |
| |
11-05-2007 09:34 AM
#95
| |
![]() ![]()
|
"Never stack off with a pair" is a phrase that's served me well up to now. Obviously never say never, but by and large you should be able to get away from pairs against real strength. Save the all-ins for playing truly terrible players or bluff-catching vs laggs, that kind of thing. |
11-06-2007 01:46 AM
#96
| |
714 hands, +$141.45 | |
| |
11-06-2007 03:13 AM
#97
| |
![]()
|
|
| |
11-06-2007 03:36 PM
#98
| |
| |
| |
11-06-2007 03:54 PM
#99
| |
so whats next? | |
11-06-2007 03:59 PM
#100
| |
| |
| |
11-06-2007 05:40 PM
#101
| |
Phase II Checkup | |
| |
11-06-2007 06:26 PM
#102
| |
Hint: | |
11-06-2007 09:00 PM
#103
| |
| |
| |
11-06-2007 09:34 PM
#104
| |
I just went through the list step-by-step and the only problem I found was that I'm losing money on off-suit connectors. I really don't play very many of them, and I think the main reason I'm losing with them is because AK0 and KQo are losers for reasons I've already determined. | |
| |
11-07-2007 12:26 AM
#105
| |
Phase III | |
| |
11-08-2007 04:20 PM
#106
| |
Two days in and I'm already failing primary goal #2! | |
| |
11-09-2007 03:16 AM
#107
| |
970 hands, -$252.90 | |
| |
11-09-2007 07:21 AM
#108
| |
![]() ![]()
|
The overpair vs set thing sounds unfortunate, but obviously the hand itself needs to be looked at before we can comment. If the overpair was less than KK then I think there's almost no reason to stack off 150BBs with it in any circumstances; if it's AA then that's a bit different but may still not be justified. |
11-10-2007 03:22 AM
#109
| |
1,170 hands, +$15.85 | |
| |
11-10-2007 09:30 AM
#110
| |
![]() ![]()
|
Experiment with half-stacking |
11-20-2007 11:30 PM
#111
| |
![]()
|
how's the op going? |
11-20-2007 11:30 PM
#112
| |
![]()
|
how's the op going? |
03-24-2008 04:24 PM
#113
| |
Apparently I didn't mention it in this thread, but I decided to take a 1-2 week break from poker and come to terms with the my leaks and shortcomings. A few weeks turned into a few months, and before I knew it I had "quit". | |
| |
03-24-2008 04:39 PM
#114
| |
Hole shit man, you alive? | |
| |
03-24-2008 04:39 PM
#115
| |
Weeeeeeeeeee Welcome back! | |
03-24-2008 06:03 PM
#116
| |
I just read this entire thread, and I must say that I'm very pleased with myself for keeping a written record of my adventure. It makes me wish that I had kept a journal earlier in my lifetime. To go back and read what I was thinking and feeling just a few months ago was very interesting and entertaining. I can only imagine what it would be like to read my 15 year old self's autobiography. | |
| |
03-25-2008 06:29 PM
#117
| |
305 hands, +$21.10 | |
| |
03-26-2008 02:43 AM
#118
| |
181 hands, -$2.84 | |
| |
03-26-2008 12:33 PM
#119
| |
![]() ![]()
|
Don't defend your blinds any more than that - there's just no need. |
03-27-2008 03:11 AM
#120
| |
499 hands, +$10.99 | |
| |
03-27-2008 02:00 PM
#121
| |
| |
| |
03-27-2008 04:00 PM
#122
| |
Session Review | |
| |
03-27-2008 04:28 PM
#123
| |
My thoughts: | |
| |
03-28-2008 12:35 AM
#124
| |
977 hands, +$43.10 | |
| |
03-28-2008 03:38 AM
#125
| |
481 hands, -$24.25 | |
| |
03-28-2008 07:26 PM
#126
| |
Session Review | |
| |
03-29-2008 04:29 AM
#127
| |
496 hands, +$72.40 | |
| |
03-29-2008 11:56 AM
#128
| |
| |
03-30-2008 03:23 AM
#129
| |
1,345 hands, +$21.85 | |
| |
03-30-2008 05:20 AM
#130
| |
539 hands, -$17.10 | |
| |
04-01-2008 04:15 AM
#131
| |
330 hands, -$16.80 | |
| |
04-01-2008 09:21 PM
#132
| |
288 hands, -$76.60 | |
| |
04-02-2008 05:35 AM
#133
| |
629 hands, -$57.95 | |
| |
04-04-2008 03:03 PM
#134
| |
1,833 hands, +$124.90 | |
| |
04-04-2008 03:31 PM
#135
| |
I might just dump that pre-flop after the reraise but I'm a FR nit so whatever. After that the flop push is OK but it screams of draw. I would rather raise to 9-10 as I'm guessing you would with a set...? It's all going in on that flop anyway, don't feel bad about getting it in with that draw. | |
| |
04-05-2008 01:46 PM
#136
| |
| |
| |
04-06-2008 09:44 AM
#137
| |
1,214 hands, +$29.95 | |
| |
04-06-2008 09:53 AM
#138
| |
The more I look at this the more confused I get but if you think raising smaller will have more FE on the flop then you can just shove turn and you won't have lost anything... I'm not as sure as I was when I posted before though lol. | |
| |
04-08-2008 10:57 AM
#139
| |
544 hands, +$3.50 | |
| |
04-09-2008 09:41 AM
#140
| |
892 hands, -$98.90 | |
| |
04-09-2008 10:31 AM
#141
| |
Lol that's happened to me so many times. I need to quit cos I'm tilting so I click off auto post blinds and spew massively until the BB comes around | |
| |
04-09-2008 10:48 AM
#142
| |
| |
| |
04-09-2008 10:58 AM
#143
| |
Basically just play exactly the same winning game from 25nl and don't think differently about your opponents. Whatever you were doing that made money at 25nl will be fine at 50nl, there's not that much of a change in play a lot of it is just psychological. | |
| |
04-09-2008 11:16 AM
#144
| |
| |
| |
04-09-2008 12:25 PM
#145
| |
Hey man just to let you know 50nl is a lot different now unfortunately. I have been experiencing the same kind of stuff. Now, I'd first off suggest running higher than 15/10 even at 25nl because I really don't think you'll win much at 50nl+ like that. Plus, I think you are leaving money on the table at 25nl. I completely skipped 50nl when I took shots at 100nl because 25nl was just that much easier. If you aren't feeling comfortable yet, I'd stick at 25nl to pad my roll more. You can also try to implement new styles as well at 25nl that may help you when you move up. Just some thoughts. | |
04-09-2008 12:41 PM
#146
| |
| |
| |
04-09-2008 01:06 PM
#147
| |
Get on AIM, you bum!!! | |
| |
04-09-2008 01:22 PM
#148
| |
I can tell you on AIM but I might as well just say it here just in case anyone else is experiencing the same problems. Did not mean to say 100nl is the same or easier than 50nl. I just meant I skipped 50nl (foolishly) because I noticed that 50nl, in the past few months, has changed to be more aggro and I figured they'd be about the same. If I'm making a lot more at 25nl then I figured I would just keep playing that until I had a good roll for a shot at 100nl. | |
04-09-2008 03:02 PM
#149
| |
![]() ![]()
|
At $1300 your really rolled more for taking shots at 50NL then playing full time. imho. At 50NL it really pays to table select more thoroughly. Do more than just make sure theres a few donks at the table, pay attention to who you have position on, and who has position on you. Theres a lot of silly aggressive people, who are bad, but a lot of times aren't worth giving position to and having 3-bet your steals from the blinds a lot. |
04-09-2008 04:45 PM
#150
| |
| |
| |