I think I fumbled the copycat issue, what I was trying to say is that when agreeing with someone elses opinion, try to add to it. There is always more to discuss. Elaboration is key. If your an inexperienced player, agree to the extent that you can, if you know the answer, and if you cannot add anything, try to ask some followup questions. I really hate seeing posts with "Did i do this right?" followed by seven yes' or no's. What I would prefer to see is responses with "yes I think you played this right but did you consider...?" or if a noob responds: "That sounds correct but what about...?"

Irisheyes, thank you for the thought provoking reply, there was no way I could encompass the entire issue. When I talk about deep hypothetical questions, I give fnord as an example. I don't expect new players to think on this level, but I encourage them to try, for this is the fastest and most thorough way to improve your game. A hypothetical question is simply discussing a concept of the game, for example, we could have a great thread discussing reverse implied odds, which is one of the least understood facets of the game.

Another note, the post was mostly directed to some of the more experienced players as a way of answering noobs questions. A new player will always ask similar questions, but the experienced players can do much better than saying "Raise KK in early position."

Thanks guys, anything else causing confusion, post here, and I will try to clarify my thoughts for you.