|
 Originally Posted by BankItDrew
I should have posted this thread, because it's the same as how I feel.
When I play only 200nl, I loose a couple buy-ins per session on average. When I play 100nl, I win 3-10 buy-ins per session.
I really think there is a huge gap between 100nl and 200nl players right now, which is why I've gone to playing 6-7 tables of 100nl instead of playing my standard 4 tables of 200nl or trying to take shots at 400nl. The 100nl just seems so soft and the play is so utterly dumb and basic overall that its easy to clean up for ridiculous winrates. I played some 25NL recently bored trying to see how much the different levels seemed different and was up to 700bb within an hour. I kept moving up and found 100nl to still be incredibly soft, not even much better than 25nl imo. I hadn't been playing under 200nl in a couple months for any length of time, and I'm glad I tried moving down, even though I am rolled for 200
my winrate is so much better at 100 I'm sticking, except for weekends where there are still tons of soft 200nl games.
|