Quote Originally Posted by daven
understand what you mean. I figured you meant reaction to 3-bets displayed in an HUD - cos i#m so accustomed to referring to this stat during gameplay. If i don#t have a decent sample size then I play against range more than behaviour - which is i guess what youäre talking about
I'm finding a quick mental merge of four stats works pretty damn nicely in the 3bet bluff department.... pfr (breadth of range), fold-to-3bet (mainly polarized to "tight" or "light"), 4-bet (has he got the fight in him / maybe stack off light?...), and ATS (for obv reasons, esp if I'm in the blinds). Combine these over a decent sample and you can make a pretty educated guess...

For example, if I got someone on the CO opening wide (pfr=20%) with an ATS that tells me they're prolly positionally aware, who's 90% fold-to-3bet and 0% 4-bet I'll 3-bet bluff the sh!t out of them. Or same villain but with a light 4-bet to shove over with a wider range 'cause they're much likelier to stack off light... And of course, fold-to-cbet is a nice additional lens to give the added possibility of stealing on a miss. Sh!t's not perfect, but if you connect the dots there's often a story there that's pretty helpful.