|
i play at pokerstars because it has the largest player pool, the rake is the best i can get seeing as i can't have rakeback on full tilt, the software is good, and it's perhaps the most secure network to do business with. also supports hold'em manager.
 Originally Posted by chatzilla
OTHER
PROS: may have weaker players, lots of bonus whoring can be done
CONS: lot less players, may not work with PT3 or HEM
hope that helps
another con: potentially dubious depending on where you live, how skeptical you are of online gaming sites. i think FT and PS are defnitely the most reliable sites in terms of $$ security, ease of transactions etc.
also i'm not sure about the rake changes at stars, but not long ago i think stars was better than FT for rake at microstakes even with rakeback on FT. may have changed since then. i'm too ignorant to know.
|