04-18-2006 02:53 AM
#1
| |
| |
| |
04-18-2006 03:51 AM
#2
| |
Personally, I think that limping in with A2-3-4, and 5 suited are profitable from the button or CO. You may get a wheel draw or even flop it... even a flush. Although once someone raises, I'd muck it preflop. These cards are good limping it to see if you could flop something big but if you cold call when someone raises you could be most certainly be dominated (outkicked) if ace flops. As for Ace-medium (6,7,8,9) . I don't bother playing them because it doesn't have any possible odds of flopping a monsters except for flush, and two pair (you also would be more inclined to bet if an ace flops). You should read "Championship Pot-limit and No-limit Holdem" by T.J. Cloutier. He explains this a great deal. | |
| |
04-18-2006 03:58 AM
#3
| |
| |
04-18-2006 05:58 AM
#4
| |
limp behind limpers | |
04-18-2006 07:17 AM
#5
| |
![]() ![]()
|
Why would raising be an option with a drawing hand? |
04-18-2006 08:09 AM
#6
| |
If you raise its for the steal. With only 1 limper it gives you momentum to either take it preflop or on a cbet. If you raise and get called you cant count on the A being an out since you could easily be outkicked. | |
| |
04-18-2006 12:06 PM
#7
| |
![]() ![]()
|
|
04-18-2006 02:28 PM
#8
| |
04-18-2006 04:36 PM
#9
| |
![]() ![]()
| |
04-18-2006 04:59 PM
#10
| |
![]() ![]()
|
|
04-18-2006 05:00 PM
#11
| |
![]() ![]()
|
oops dbl post. |
04-18-2006 05:26 PM
#12
| |
| |
04-18-2006 05:29 PM
#13
| |
| |
04-18-2006 06:17 PM
#14
| |
04-18-2006 06:20 PM
#15
| |
| |
| |
04-19-2006 01:13 AM
#16
| |
![]() ![]()
| |
04-19-2006 06:04 PM
#17
| |
![]() ![]()
| |
| |
04-19-2006 06:17 PM
#18
| |
| |
04-19-2006 07:11 PM
#19
| |
![]() ![]()
|
Its not a huge money maker, but it can definitely be played profitably. My average winnings are about 1/2-1 big blind on A9-A2s. Even if you break even with it, its still widening your range which is a good thing. And because they tend to lose you small pots and win you big pots, they will rarely be the cause of major downswings. I agree open limping with it is -EV, and if there is a lot of PFRing than limping in mid position after 1 caller might get you in trouble too. But its a hell of a lot better hand than [any 2], which seems to be the value you are placing on it if its only good for stealing blinds and cbetting. |
04-19-2006 07:31 PM
#20
| |
It's like [any 2] without the straight possibilities. | |
04-19-2006 11:03 PM
#21
| |
04-19-2006 11:14 PM
#22
| |
| |
04-19-2006 11:28 PM
#23
| |
Ok...Think about it this way. I have about 600k hands for NL25 in my database. The average VPIP is 26.60%. Any AX's suited is a better hand than the average hand played at this level. With this average, people have to be playing junk like K4s and worse. The key is to play slightly tighter than your opponents. With the opponents at this level playing soooo many hands that are -EV, you have an opportunity to loosen up your own game and play some hands that wouldn't fly at higher levels, and make money. The most winning players at this level are Semi-loose and aggressive players, not tight aggressive. They dominate the loose passive players. I am in the green at every position with AXs at NL25. Try it for yourself. | |
04-19-2006 11:35 PM
#24
| |
![]() ![]()
|
If your playing Axs with the intention of showing down your pair of Aces unimproved on the river then it will defnitely be -EV. I play this hand for nut nut flush potential, 2 pair, or 3 of a kind only. Otherwise I'm taking one stab at a flop w/ an [Axx] flop and/or if I'm in position (its about 33% less likely that someone has an Ace if you have one). |
04-20-2006 12:01 AM
#25
| |
| |
04-20-2006 12:03 AM
#26
| |
| |
04-20-2006 12:17 AM
#27
| |
you play every single ace on the button if there are some limpers in front of you? | |
04-20-2006 12:23 AM
#28
| |
| |
04-20-2006 08:18 AM
#29
| |
| |
04-20-2006 08:53 AM
#30
| |
![]() ![]()
|
I think Lodogg is on the money here. 25NL players are loose and passive enough for flushes to earn you $$$ in the long run with Axs. You can't just play it willy nilly, though - position and the general aggression/tightness etc of the table HAS to be considered. |