Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumBeginners Circle

What is your range on the button?

Results 1 to 13 of 13
  1. #1

    Default What is your range on the button?

    I've seen a variety of ranges discussed. From staying tight to raising with cards like suited connectors or suited gaps in this position. I've even seen people saying they limp in with Ace rag suited here.

    What's the best range to play on the button?
  2. #2
    Depends on limp/call/raise.

    I'll limp 22+, Axs+, Kxs+, all SCs, 86s+ and any two broadways.

    My calling and raising ranges are similare to MP. It also depends on the table.
  3. #3
    The best range to play on the button is the one which fully exploits the Small and Big Blind's tendencies.

    You also need to provide a little more information about the situation. Have players limped/raised PF or has the table folded to you?
  4. #4
    bode's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    8,043
    Location
    slow motion
    Quote Originally Posted by kb coolman
    Depends on limp/call/raise.

    I'll limp 22+, Axs+, Kxs+, all SCs, 86s+ and any two broadways.

    My calling and raising ranges are similare to MP. It also depends on the table.
    wat? you're doing this on the button? do you play like 40/2?

    As for OP's question, I raise just over 50% of hands OTB in an unraised pot, but as the big spender has said this depends heavily on the SB and BB's tendencies.
    eeevees are not monies yet...they are like baby monies.
  5. #5
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by kb coolman
    Depends on limp/call/raise.

    I'll limp 22+, Axs+, Kxs+, all SCs, 86s+ and any two broadways.

    My calling and raising ranges are similare to MP. It also depends on the table.
    I'd rather raise those
  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by iopq
    Quote Originally Posted by kb coolman
    Depends on limp/call/raise.

    I'll limp 22+, Axs+, Kxs+, all SCs, 86s+ and any two broadways.

    My calling and raising ranges are similare to MP. It also depends on the table.
    I'd rather raise those
    I do at tighter tables. At loose tables, I've found it's more profitable to limp behind at $10NL.
  7. #7
    Overall I think I'm about 40/30 from the button and my attempt to steal (from all positions - I can't remember from the button only) is over 40%. But as has already been said, it could vary A LOT depending on who is in the blinds.

    To be honest I probably steal slightly too much, and limp behind a UTG/MP/CO raiser a bit too much too.
  8. #8
    Stacks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    4,015
    Location
    Im opedipus bitch, the original balla.
    Quote Originally Posted by kb coolman
    Quote Originally Posted by iopq
    Quote Originally Posted by kb coolman
    Depends on limp/call/raise.

    I'll limp 22+, Axs+, Kxs+, all SCs, 86s+ and any two broadways.

    My calling and raising ranges are similare to MP. It also depends on the table.
    I'd rather raise those
    I do at tighter tables. At loose tables, I've found it's more profitable to limp behind at $10NL.
    I can understand limping behind other limpers with hands like mid-small pps, 54s-T9s, but I would most certainly be isolating with Broadways, Ax, Kx type hands. And your reasoning that it's a loose table shouldn't affect this much.. If it's a loose table the range of hands they will be limp/calling should be wide enough that we aren't just relying on them limp/folding or limp/calling, check/folding. That is, our Ax, Kx, Broadway type hands should be ahead of the portion of their range, and we can expect to get a few streets worth of value when we hit.
  9. #9
    texa8's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    208
    Location
    Melbourne Australia
    Depends on limp/call/raise.

    I'll limp 22+, Axs+, Kxs+, all SCs, 86s+ and any two broadways.

    My calling and raising ranges are similare to MP. It also depends on the table.
    I'd rather raise those
    i raise hands like these when folded to me with the goal of taking the blinds (assuming of course the blinds arent loose passive and theres fold equity).
    Those kinds of hands all have potential post flop, but even if u miss if u isolate one player out of position you're still good to take it down with a cbet depending on the texture of the board.
  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by XxStacksxX
    I can understand limping behind other limpers with hands like mid-small pps, 54s-T9s, but I would most certainly be isolating with Broadways, Ax, Kx type hands. And your reasoning that it's a loose table shouldn't affect this much.. If it's a loose table the range of hands they will be limp/calling should be wide enough that we aren't just relying on them limp/folding or limp/calling, check/folding. That is, our Ax, Kx, Broadway type hands should be ahead of the portion of their range, and we can expect to get a few streets worth of value when we hit.
    I should have further clarified my limping range. This would have been explaind had I defined my call/raise range, but I'm lazy. I'm really talking about limping QJ/KJ/AT offsuit type hands, 22-66, weak suited aces and kings...the speculative stuff I wouldn't play EP. I'm usually raising KQ+ and AJ+ for value, depending on the table. I've been playing tables lately that routinely get 3-4 callers with a 10xBB 3bet in position, so raising for isolation is a little counter-productive. I've recently moved up to $25NL, so I'm sure it will change some.
  11. #11
    Guest
    it doesn't make sense to limp ATo because if you don't get it heads up your hand plays like shit
    in fact I'd rather openfold ATo from every position than limp it

    AJo-, KQo- are such fail hands
    I've yet to make a profit on any of them in my db
    probably because I'm a bad player, but still

    I mostly have hands in FR so that may be it
  12. #12
    You know, I need to pull those up, too. I've looked at my profitable UTG hands, but never on the BTN....
  13. #13
    Stacks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    4,015
    Location
    Im opedipus bitch, the original balla.
    Limping behind with hands like KJ, QJ, AT, QT, KT, etc type hands is not good imho. These are hands that do not play all that well in multiway pots unless you hit the nuts (straight or flush). However, these hands play relatively well in a raised pot IP against a limp/calling range. Isolating is so incredibly profitable.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •