07-05-2008 09:11 AM
#1
| |
| |
07-05-2008 09:14 AM
#2
| |
07-05-2008 09:22 AM
#3
| |
| |
07-05-2008 09:33 AM
#4
| |
![]() ![]()
| |
07-05-2008 09:38 AM
#5
| |
| |
| |
07-05-2008 09:53 AM
#6
| |
![]() ![]()
|
|
| |
07-05-2008 11:55 AM
#7
| |
07-05-2008 03:31 PM
#8
| |
![]()
| |
07-05-2008 04:16 PM
#9
| |
| |
07-05-2008 04:44 PM
#10
| |
![]() ![]()
| |
07-07-2008 05:41 AM
#11
| |
| |
| |
07-07-2008 06:24 AM
#12
| |
| |
07-07-2008 10:43 AM
#13
| |
no one uses agg numbers by street? | |
| |
07-07-2008 10:48 AM
#14
| |
| |
| |
07-07-2008 10:52 AM
#15
| |
| |
07-07-2008 11:17 AM
#16
| |
I have been using W$WSF% as a better overall aggression indicator along with AF. My popup will tell me AF by street if I need but I think W$WSF is an indicative of our own aggression if used properly, why not theirs. | |
07-07-2008 11:23 AM
#17
| |
i much prefer Agg % than AF. | |
| |
07-07-2008 11:41 AM
#18
| |
07-07-2008 04:25 PM
#19
| |
![]() ![]()
|
Ya, W$WSF is pretty similar to AF. it basically tells you how much they are fighting to win each pot. It gives you a pretty good idea how often they are putting the moves on post flop(and it converges faster than any of those stats individually). I also use it in a similar manner as mentioned earlier instead of W$SD in combination with WTSD. |