Sorry my post was very unclear i meant fold pre as in never open. We are looking at a marginally profitable situation at best with a higher chance of getting played back at due to our lagg image. Ie. Why raise the very bottom of our range that is questionable if it cant stand getting played back at when we are more likely to get played back at?

Quote Originally Posted by XxStacksxX
Quote Originally Posted by Donkafelts
I'd say fold pre since table image is so lagg. Any problem with this?
Fold turn if you like money.
Well, most villains at these stakes aren't paying attention to table image. Same is true for non-regs at 100nl-200nl. They aren't usually just playing their cards, oblivious to ranges, image, etc.

However, if table image was considered, then it would probably make a call preflop less a mistake. If you are viewed as lagg, then correct opponents should open up their range when when in pots with you, especially in position. This would carry over into them 3betting a wider range for value against you.

Against a range of {JJ+, AK}, AQo only has 28% equity with pretty poor reverse implied odds. As we expand this range, to say {99+, AQ+}, then our equity obviously increases to 35%. It's not much, and I would assume our reverse implied odds stayed about the same. However, if opponents are adjusting correctly then they should be 3betting a 'LAGG' opponent with a wider range, thus giving us more equity. However, probably still not enough to make a call OOP here profitable.

Fold is, as has been said, pretty standard preflop. I'd also likely fold QQ and AK here as well, and not think to much about it .