Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumBeginners Circle

What is The Long Run Exactly?

Results 1 to 8 of 8

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default What is The Long Run Exactly?

    My question has a couple of pieces, and yes it's born of frustration. I've been losing steadily. I play tight and aggressive at loose, passive tables, strictly NL so that I can protect my good hands, generally with pot-size bets.

    It doesn't work. I keep hearing about how I should stick with it -- it works over the long run. What is that exactly? I had thought if your bankroll was 500 big bets you could endure even the worst swings. Well, that's not the case. I swing from $300 to $9

    Second part of the question: what's most important? table selection? calculating the odds? reading the other hands? guts?

    My theory is that different things are most important at different moments. But I would more frequently give weight to your read on other people's hands.

    -your table selection wisdom means precisely dick if you can't punish the loose players who chase or call holding the second best hand.
    -your calculation of the pot odds you need are a waste of time unless you're right about what you're up against
    -your courageous big bets, on top pair and ace kicker will kill you if you don't realize the other guy hit 2 pair

    So the last part of the question is: how do you read other people's hands?
  2. #2

    Default Addendum - can online poker be beat?

    So, when you're sitting there, what DO you know?

    The reason I ask is that you need to know
    -whether the table has the right attitude for your play
    -what starting hands are good, what to do when the flop hits you or misses you
    -how to bet such that other guys don't have the pot odds to draw on you
    -whether they will draw on you anyway
    -in what situations each of these players raises, calls, whatever

    And you have to know this online, where
    -you cannot see anyone
    -the players change every couple of minutes
    -for all you know this player only has $25 of their $5,000 bankroll in play

    I want to hear from some people. Do you really sit there folding >80% preflop, and getting out if you don't get two pair or better? Patience is one thing, but watching these people take pot after pot with K4 off, and getting a big bet per hour for your trouble?

    Do you really?
  3. #3
    We have so many good and great players here what you need to do is post some hand histories. Because what some people say is "tight agressive" is loose and passive. Im not saying your in that catagory but I know I was at one point. And when your in that catagory you would be better off being a maniac, because your upswings would be big and downswing would be big. Because right now you get beat by sharks and maniacs. Do you have Pokertracker? It is really good at showing leaks in the game. I hope this helps. Nobody can argue with the success of the people here they post the monthly totals. Tyson UP, Fnord UP, Bubble Boy UP, and many others, and not up once in a while but up consistently, monthly. Just my two cents worth.
    Holy crap I cant play against Yoda!!
  4. #4

    Default Re: What is The Long Run Exactly?

    Quote Originally Posted by LeFou
    It doesn't work. I keep hearing about how I should stick with it -- it works over the long run. What is that exactly? I had thought if your bankroll was 500 big bets you could endure even the worst swings. Well, that's not the case. I swing from $300 to $9
    When you are playing ring games, something common to hear is, "Just think of it all as 1 big session. You'll be up, you'll be down, but play the numbers and in the end, it'll even out." What this means is that there are a lot of situations where you cannot look at the short term.

    Imagine calculating EVs. You have a 35 to 1 shot to win. But you will win 50 to 1 on your investment. This is a positive EV. If you play this hand 35 times, you will win once. But on the 50 to 1 investment, this means that the 1 time you do win, it will more than make up for the 34 times you lost. Though you shouldn't expect to run into this situation 35 times at 1 sit down, you will see it again eventually. You should see it more times, in other sessions, and other games. Look at it as 1 big session. You may not be up today, but it will all even out cause you are playing your best.

    That's what they mean by "the long run" - life.

    Quote Originally Posted by LeFou
    Second part of the question: what's most important? table selection? calculating the odds? reading the other hands? guts?

    My theory is that different things are most important at different moments. But I would more frequently give weight to your read on other people's hands.

    -your table selection wisdom means precisely dick if you can't punish the loose players who chase or call holding the second best hand.
    I think your talking about table position, not selection. Position will put you in the spot to stick it to all these people. Sit to the left of big bettors and you will never have to spend too much.

    Imagine I call the big blind, then the person after me bets big. I will fold and I have just waisted that money. Now imagine if the person were sitting before you, he'd bet, and you chould fold without putting a penny in.

    In the opposite manner, you will want to sit to the right of chasers, so you can bet big before they act and they will fold to you.

    Another situation: 1 big bettor, a chaser calls, you raise after and the chaser says, "Well, I've alredy put in this much, I'll put in more" Now imagine that he is after you, he sees a raise, and a re-raise and says, "I want to save this money"
    Quote Originally Posted by LeFou
    -your calculation of the pot odds you need are a waste of time unless you're right about what you're up against
    Read the flop. You can usually tell what you're up against. If you are chasing toward the nuts, and you have good pot odds (positive EV), CHASE YOUR ASS OFF! If there is 2 pair on the board, and you are justifying calling to chase your flush. Don't. Lay it down. You probably playing against a full house and drawing dead.

    Quote Originally Posted by LeFou
    -your courageous big bets, on top pair and ace kicker will kill you if you don't realize the other guy hit 2 pair
    Are you betting huge with top pair, top kicker? Are you re-re-raising when people re-raise you? You always have to consider what is out there, and remember TPTK will never be the nuts.

    Quote Originally Posted by LeFou
    So the last part of the question is: how do you read other people's hands?
    Again, it's very tough. Look at everything you know.
    How did he bet in other hands?
    How did he bet pre-flop? Did he call the big blind? Did he raise? How much?
    Did he bet strong when 1 particular card came down? (i.e. Ace on the turn)
    Did he slow his betting post flop and then start betting big again at the river? That signifies slow-play.

    Ask yourself all these questions and hopefully you will be able to make educated guesses.
    I don't know what they have to say
    It makes no difference anyway.
    Whatever it is...
    I'm against it.
  5. #5
    Depending on the table of 6 or 10. If at a 10 table you should be folding sometimes at least 80% of time.
    And of course you dont fold everytime with only one pair. But if someone is betting big you had better have top pair top kicker or close to it. If the board is ugly your folding that as well.
    I love players with a $5000 bankroll they will be more willing to me loosely because they have so much more.

    Playing poker for profit IS or CAN BE very BORING you are playing 15 to 20% of hands including blinds. What I have found works for me is to play 1 table and get a idea of the table(how it is being played) then I start 2 tables (same thing) and sometimes 3 tables. It makes it better bacause your folding so many times at 1 table you get bored and play too many hands. If you do as I it "seems" like you get to play more hands because your seeing much more hands per hour. It can get hectic (playing 2 or 3 ands at once) but makes it easier to be patient.

    Overall if you need to ask about the 80% folding question, your playing too many hands. Once again I hope this helps. Its tough.
    Holy crap I cant play against Yoda!!
  6. #6

    Default Re: What is The Long Run Exactly?

    Quote Originally Posted by LeFou
    It doesn't work. I keep hearing about how I should stick with it -- it works over the long run. What is that exactly? I had thought if your bankroll was 500 big bets you could endure even the worst swings. Well, that's not the case. I swing from $300 to $9
    I've had over -$200 swings at $25. However, I play looser than Ttanaka, so even if my win rate was higher (big if), my variance is certainly higher.

    Quote Originally Posted by LeFou
    Second part of the question: what's most important? table selection? calculating the odds? reading the other hands? guts?
    Table selection, knowing the important odds, reading players.

    Quote Originally Posted by LeFou
    So the last part of the question is: how do you read other people's hands?
    You don't. Make a guess on a range of hands and play the player.

    Oh, and onto your question of what the long run is. Think 25,000 or so hands.
  7. #7

    Default Re: Addendum - can online poker be beat?

    Quote Originally Posted by LeFou
    So, when you're sitting there, what DO you know?

    The reason I ask is that you need to know
    -whether the table has the right attitude for your play
    -what starting hands are good, what to do when the flop hits you or misses you
    -how to bet such that other guys don't have the pot odds to draw on you
    -whether they will draw on you anyway
    -in what situations each of these players raises, calls, whatever

    And you have to know this online, where
    -you cannot see anyone
    -the players change every couple of minutes
    -for all you know this player only has $25 of their $5,000 bankroll in play

    Sounds like you may need more help than I can offer in 1 post. So instead of giving you a fish to feed you for the day, I'm going to teach you to fish.

    Check these out.
    http://www.flopturnriver.com/poker-books.html
    http://www.flopturnriver.com/phpBB2/...pic.php?t=1273

    This will get you started on analyzing your game. You can get help about recognizing your hands, analyzing the flop, reading other players, etc.

    You are always welcome to post questions here about specific and I'm sure you can get just about any question answered. But for overall help like you are looking for, I'd say get back to basics and start to read.

    Quote Originally Posted by LeFou
    I want to hear from some people. Do you really sit there folding >80% preflop, and getting out if you don't get two pair or better? Patience is one thing, but watching these people take pot after pot with K4 off, and getting a big bet per hour for your trouble?

    Do you really?
    No, not folding 80% = playing 20%. I think the average person here sees the flop with about 30% - 35% of their starting hands.

    You play the cards and the percentages fall into place. I can remember seeing my "flops seen" % as low as 19% once. I've also seen it as high as 52%.

    Here's how this works. I play 1 out of every 3 hands. I win the pot with 1 out of every 12 hands. I lose $.50 every time I play and lose which is 3 out of 12 hands, or $1.50. The 1 time I win in those 12 hands I win about $3.00.

    Every 12 hands played I spend $.50 and make $3.00. This converts to an overall winning strategy where I make $1.50 / 12 hands.

    This is all just an example, but you get the picture. We're not trying to win the lottery. You don't get paid extra for hitting a royal flush. But you can play consistently, and don't get impatient. You can be profitable.
    I don't know what they have to say
    It makes no difference anyway.
    Whatever it is...
    I'm against it.
  8. #8
    My flops seen % is around the 25% to 35% range but I play short handed. In a full game this would be around 22% - 27% (hopefully). NL I havn't played ring games for a while so can't really comment. SNGs were a diff story, linnear progression from 1%-50%

    The most important concept missed with the 300BB approach is that you must be a winning player at that game and that level. If you lose over half of it you could be running bad but it is more likely you are not beating the game. If you are running bad, once you're BR dips to a certain level you can either bump it back up or drop down a limit and rebuild it.

    I actually quit playing 25NL at PP as I just wasn't beating it, it just seemed that everyhand was a bad beat and someone could be as likely to have 72os as AA. Maybe I was just having a bad run, maybe I just wasn't up to the task. I actually think it was the latter, looking back I would guess I was playing to loose and not paying enough attention to hand reading.
    Poker is all about the long long long long long long long term . . .
    Barney's back . . . back again . . .

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •