There is no set range for an X% player if X isnt very loose or very tight. You can certainly get an idea, but different people will have very different ranges on the same percentage of hands.

Some loosish players will play things like A8o too often to raises.
Some will play tight to raises but will limp or limp/fold a tonne.
Some will fold the weak aces but will play lots of broadways.
Some will play lots of 67o type hands that can make a straight, but fewer of the A9 type hands that are easily dominated.
Some will fold the 67o, but totally love seeing a flop with 67s and A7s.

Its the same with tighter players. Some will play like 22-AA, AQ+ from any position. Others will play like 88-AA, AT+, KJ+ and come out with pretty similar looking stats. The kinds of decisions you need to make against these kinds of players in the same situations are often going to be very different. This is why you need to watch hands you arent involved in and see what kinds of hands people showdown in different postflop situations rather than just relying on stats and an arbitrary "this percentage = this range" mentality. Dont get me wrong, stats are a great starting point. But stats are not reads (or at least the small subset of VPIP, PFR, AF, 3bet that we are often given in hand histories does not amount to a read).