|
|
 Originally Posted by bikes
this thread is pretty useless. just find the most profitable way to play poker and do it. if you 6 table your way to msnl awesome and if you 24 table in ssnl for a small winrate and large amounts of rb equally awesome
First, if you think the thread is useless then don't post in it - simple.
Second, I disagree with what you're saying. I think the issues of volume and winrates and rakeback is a very unique situation for each person and depends on several variables, including your poker goals.
--If poker is a very important side income for you and your goal is to maximize your hourly rate, then playing a bunch of tables with good rakeback may be best for you which maximizes your hourly rate TODAY.
--If poker is your career and your goal is to make the most amount of money over your ENTIRE CAREER, then playing less tables and focusing on improving your game may be best because that maximizes your hourly IN THE FUTURE. Obviously you still need to make enough to live on, but in this case there is a big difference between "6 table your way to msnl awesome and if you 24 table in ssnl for a small winrate and large amounts of rb"
--If you're a recreational player who wants to make it to 100NL then grind out some good profits, then you may want to play some mass multitabling sessions and some <4 table sessions to improve.
There are infinity other situations that I don't need to list because I think I've made my point. I don't think its valid just make a blanket statement like you did.
However, talking about these things with other people and getting an idea for what their poker goals are and what they're trying to accomplish helps you refine your own ideas, does it not?
|
Reply With Quote