Doan, again, let's say that you raise / shove with 33 out of position. And Mr. 30 percent re-raise to your left (remember my hypothetical) calls your shove or re-raises your raise with various higher pocket pairs and higher overcards. You are going to end up in a lot of coin-flip or less than coinflip pots. Further, since you are out of position, you aren't guaranteed to go heads up with him but rather are also going to lose pots to anyone at the table who is playing normal poker, gets a read on what you are doing, and waits until he has, say, pocket 8's to fire his bullets.

Again, I am not saying your approach is wrong. It could be right if you can be sure that the Villain isn't going to properly tailor his range for calling your shoves and you are able to successfully isolate against the Villain without inviting calls from other players with strong hands.

I do think, however, that you seem to be quite resistant to the idea that there can be any circumstances where you might have to fold these cards out of position. I don't think there is one right answer or approach to playing poker. But I do think that flexibility and tailoring an approach to exploit the leaks in those around you at the table are crucial skills. Good play, in my mind, starts not with the desire to play certain hands but in an understanding of what others are likely to do in response to your actions and whether you can take advantage of that situation given the cards that you have. You don't have to agree with my assumption that one might want to fold low pocket pairs out of position on table 1. But I am sure that there is some table texture, somewhere, on which betting a low pocket pair out of position, whether with a limp, a raise, or a shove, is a negative expected value play. The point of my post was to make players aware of the things they ought to be looking for, not to proscribe one approach for playing these different types of tables.