TT x2

1)Top off your stack
2) the more reads you can get on villain the more accurate our ranges will be = +EV for us
3) Any hud stats are better than none as long as you say the sample size
4) Reasoning for the raise size pre?
5)"Preflop, I have to put him on a pretty wide range." How do you assume this with no reads or stats to indicate his style of play AT ALL??
6) Fold flop if you think villain is competetant at all because if you think about your plan for the turn it's going to end up him shoving a lot of cards and us tanking and folding because of our gay stack size ;(.
7) As played the 0.75 looks like a really weak bet that he could be making with a wide range (I'm not sure how we're supposed to really put villain on any range because you haven't really told us anything about him). Just try to make it to showdown at this point imo...

Originally Posted by Imthenewfish

1)Top off your stack
2) the more reads you can get on villain the more accurate our ranges will be = +EV for us
3) Any hud stats are better than none as long as you say the sample size
4) Reasoning for the raise size pre?
5)"Preflop, I have to put him on a pretty wide range." How do you assume this with no reads or stats to indicate his style of play AT ALL??
6) Fold flop if you think villain is competetant at all because if you think about your plan for the turn it's going to end up him shoving a lot of cards and us tanking and folding because of our gay stack size ;(.
7) As played the 0.75 looks like a really weak bet that he could be making with a wide range (I'm not sure how we're supposed to really put villain on any range because you haven't really told us anything about him). Just try to make it to showdown at this point imo...

3) I'm not currently using a tracking software so no HUD available.

4) at about 3.5x it's big enough to fold out the blinds but probably keep in the limper and I have a hand that I want to see a flop with.

5) because at this level many people try to limp with anything that is suited, has an A, small pairs or connectors. Even without specific reads I'm working to get beyond "hey I have a pair, bet" to "how does my pair stack up to what villain might have". I think even sitting down at a table you can make some basic assumptions about ranges and work to narrow it down. I hadn't seen op do anything crazy or spew money. He open limped from early position then called my raise so he's either really loose preflop/ slowplaying a monster or has a hand he thinks he can extract value from OOP postflop.

How do you play this hand if it's your first hand at the table?

6) the pot is $10 and I have a PSB behind. How do you play this if you had a full stack and you have $20 behind instead?

Caddie, I agree, calling pretty much commits me to the hand given stacks. I think I'm ahead of enough to see it through at this point. Assuming that I am committed here what do you think? I lean towards three scenarios in the order of likelyhood given the action,

1) he has a draw that missed on the flop and he wants to see another card
2) he has two overs or some value (small to med pair) that he wants to see showdown with
3) he has a monster and wants to induce a raise

thoughts? How do you play this hand differently with a full stack here?

With a 100bb stack, you get full value for your made hands and you're not left with a funky SPR and/or getting committed on the flop, among other things.