|
|
 Originally Posted by JustinSKS
I' m still unsure of how you guys decide what is more important info than other info which might sway a decision from X to Y
Wow. Now that you mention it, I am too. We all do this. We all weigh many factors and somehow decide which are most important or relevant. However, the analyses and conclusions are the results of a dynamic process.
Why is it sometimes more important to weigh table dynamics over personal reads? Surely it is. We try to have a feel for that, but what is the exact logic that leads to the switch?
Hey Bikes! How about spoon-feeding us with a sticky post on this one? 
Originally Posted by JustinSKS
or vis-a-vis.
Did you mean vise versa here?
|
Reply With Quote