I'm going off the rails on a crazy train here. Try to hang with me. Think of Range Odds as being a more specific version of Pot Odds. They are effectively "Range" Pot Odds.

Think of a situation where you're faced with making a big call against an opponent you have reads on. Say you have AK offsuit on an AQQ37 rainbow board. You acted passive on the flop because of the queens. You tried to control the pot size for whatever reason in case the opponent had the queen. Now say in first position on the river your opponent leads into you with a 35xBB bet into a 40xBB pot. Now your call would be about 2:1. You have to decide how often you're ahead against this opponent in this spot. Are you ahead more than 1 out of every 2 times this scenerio plays out with all the information you gathered? You decide the opponent is capable of making a move here with a worse hand. The opponent was also just hit with a bad beat, which may make him tilt. You call, he shows down A7, and you rake the pot.

Can you really coin this simply "Pot Odds"? The same scenerio plays out similar in Limit when you call down a very aggressive player with ace high. We've always considered this simply Pot Odds. Pot Odds are less specific though are they not?

Pot Odds are oblivious to subjective reason.

Do players make mistakes by considering Pot Odds in a spot like this, instead of Range Odds? Discuss.