Theory question (based on a hand)

08-31-2010 11:38 AM #1
Tasha View Profile View Forum Posts Private Message View Blog Entries Join Date May 2010 Posts 303 Location At the far end of the table	Originally Posted by daven poker is far too complicated for me too Are you suggesting that we should both take up Gin instead? Or just me? hmm explain why you think villain's 3-bet / flat huge 4-bet range is wide? I agree that only QQ+, AK is calling here ever, and the AK is very, very doubtful I'm not sure myself now why I wrote 'wide', but what I meant is that he is only going to bet like that if he has a strong pair that already dominates AK. Could be I was thinking 'width of his range' only it didn't come out like that.

Reply With Quote

08-31-2010 04:40 PM #2
daven View Profile View Forum Posts Private Message View Blog Entries trolling freetrollers Join Date Aug 2007 Posts 8,697 Location soaking up ethanol, moving on up	Originally Posted by Tasha Are you suggesting that we should both take up Gin instead? poker drives me to booze sometimes. Gin, if that's what i have to hand, for sure. I'm sure everyone who plays decent poker volume can relate
	don't raise with the straight flush bro, nobody ever gonna call that shit allin, reload, repeat please read: http://www.philgalfond.com/lets-make-some-changes/
Reply With Quote

09-01-2010 11:43 AM #3
Tasha View Profile View Forum Posts Private Message View Blog Entries Join Date May 2010 Posts 303 Location At the far end of the table	Originally Posted by daven poker drives me to booze sometimes. Gin, if that's what i have to hand, for sure. I'm sure everyone who plays decent poker volume can relate You can have the Gin and I'll take the Rummy and Coke

Reply With Quote