Neither of you understand the fundamental theorem of poker and that's why you're confused.

Not everything has to be a perfect little value bet or perfect little bluff inside of these nice little molds that are created for you when you're at 2nl trying to understand why you should buy in for full and can barely wipe your own ass.
To our discharge, it's being hammered constantly in the BC that we never ever ever should wish an opp to fold a worse hand (and yes I do understand that it is important to teach that and keep it simple and that it's true in the vast majority of cases).

I even asked in IRC yesterday if anyone could think of a situation where it is not the case and some FTR reg said no, unless your life or bankroll depends on opp folding the hand.

Now for the fundamental theorem of poker, I think I get it also: if opp folds, he "makes a mistake" because he has sufficient showdown equity to profitably call with the pot odds offered to him. So we gain from his mistake if he folds. If he calls, he does not make a mistake, so we loose. What we gain or loose when he folds or calls is the difference between our EV when he folds ($12) and our EV when he calls ($10.95), so $1.05

No?

And as far as buying in full, we do, but we also face short stackers a lot, so this kind of stuff doesn't happen so rarely that it is not worth mentioning, right?

...feel like I'm gonna get trout-slapped again...