07-01-2005 08:11 PM
#1
| |
| |
| |
07-01-2005 08:16 PM
#2
| |
People's stacks ever fall below the starting buyin? | |
07-01-2005 09:23 PM
#3
| |
i knew there wud be one smart ass to this thread | |
| |
07-02-2005 01:52 AM
#4
| |
![]() ![]()
|
I do the same thing, if I drop below 2/3rd buyin, or somewhere around that vicinity. |
| |
07-02-2005 02:04 AM
#5
| |
| |
07-02-2005 02:52 AM
#6
| |
| |
07-02-2005 03:59 AM
#7
| |
If there are players at the table with more than the max I'll add even half a buck after each hand is completed, you just never know when you are gonna double up. Yesterday I forgot to reload for while and suddenly I called a raise, hit top set on a rainbow flop and it was pushed twice after I checked it. I was at $170 instead of $200 so another 60 profit woulda been better. | |
07-02-2005 06:02 AM
#8
| |
Guest
| |
07-02-2005 11:55 AM
#9
| |
Infact, there should be an auto-top-up feature... just last night my first 2 hands at one table where crazy, against the same op: | |
| |
07-02-2005 04:55 PM
#10
| |
I understand the thought of doubling up, but it can also go the other way. I always start with the typical buy in for that table. 2 situations happened to me today, where if I were playing with a larger amount I would have lost a ton. Both times lost to bad beats on the river, I'm talking like 2 outs each time, and they hit them. So instead up being really pissed about losing a decent chunk of change, I just reloaded, knowing I'd win it right back, and I did. Losing that much didn't put me on tilt. | |
| |
07-02-2005 05:52 PM
#11
| |
| |
07-04-2005 08:37 AM
#12
| |
![]() ![]()
|
I guess if you win big hands more often than you lose them, re-stacking is a smart move. My current run is probably 2:10 on the win:lose front, so I've been quite grateful not to have restacked lately |
07-04-2005 10:08 AM
#13
| |
once I get down 3-5 BBs, I reload. | |
| |
07-04-2005 11:36 AM
#14
| |
| |