should i sit down with less than 100 big bets?
Although most people at this site will disagree with me,
I have been successful so far playing short stacks at 25NL.
I always start with $10.
I just started playing Towergaming.com, for the PokerOffice bonus, and I can find many tables with $10.00+ per pot with 40%+ flop players.
Yesterday I made $28 in 3 hours 2 tabling. That is maybe 300 hands or so. The day before I was up $11.00 , had a few beers and found myself down $3.00 for 2 hours of play in total. I am not using any kind of tracker at this site cuz I have Poker-Spy and it is unsupported.

I lost one $10 stack on one table, but on the other table I was up to $27.
Then I started over again and made about $6-7 on each of 2 tables.

So far I have been successful. I am no pro. I have cleared many bonuses, been manking around one FULL buyin per 1000 hands.

My point is that you can buy-in with 40 Big Blinds and still make money.
If you get stacked 3 times you are only down $30 instead of $75.
When you get aggressive it is easy for you to get pot committed. This means people are MORE WILLING to call your last $3-$5 if you go AI, where against a BIG STACK they will fold more easily.
Small Stacks = Tight Aggressive - minus the implied odds
Will somebody really try to bluff $3 into a $10 pot , cuz that is all you have left most of the time. Answer = YES!!!
So you get what I think is REVERSED IMPLIED ODDS. Which is extra money for being short. People just aren't afraid of you when you hold the nuts.

One day I will learn how to play deep lol

Flame me and hang me out to dry!!!